Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J Allen Lamb & Edward S Pocock III Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of J ALLEN LAMB & EDWARD S POCOCK III FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE$34,613
CENTRAL CT STATE UNIVERSITY$13,829
Individual grant recipient$5,700
TRACK HEROES$5,000
IAWP FOUNDATION$5,000
CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC$5,000
SOUTHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES$3,120
JOE & KAY CALVNAESE FOUNDATION$2,500
WCHDSA$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,469
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON$1,000
SHS ALUMNI WALL OF HONOR FDN$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 9%AERIAL INVESTIGATION REGIMENT: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NY
MA
NV
PA
CT
KY
SC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 9 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$1.0M
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+43%

Still filing today

33%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $878k
  • TH
    TRACK HEROES RYKER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $71k · revenue +150% · 67% of their budget
  • CC
    CENTRAL CT STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $41k

Funded once

  • GF
    GRACE FARMS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +56%
  • AI
    Aerial Investigation Regiment AIR Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · 100% of their budget
  • RK
    RENBAR KENNELS LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Airlines Pilots Retirement Foundation
2
Ginnfarms Corporation
Environment
3
Foundation for Agronomic Research Inc
4
International Institute of Global Resilience Inc
International
5
Barracks Project Inc

Aiding in finacial helping vets

Housing & Shelter
6
Sibley-Ocheyedan Shooting Generals
7
Gerald T Sutliff Trust Uwill
8
Vets Corps Inc
Human Services
9
Fisa Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Freedom Farm
11
Helicopters for Heroes
Human Services
12
Smoking Shields Fl Inc

Provide financial support for police officers, veterans, and their families in times of need.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bread for Life Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aerial Investigation Regiment Air Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE — $878,037 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLECENTRAL CT STATE UNIVERSITY — $40,531 · Other+22 more — $157,038 · Other+22 moreTRACK HEROES RYKER — $70,500 · HealthGRACE FARMS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON INC — $3,944 · PhilanthropyAerial Investigation Regiment AIR Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesIAWP FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $5,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,000 · EducationBREAD FOR LIFE INC — $5,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,075,606Health$70,500Philanthropy$33,944Human Services$25,500Crime & Legal$10,000Education$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRACK HEROES RYKER — $70,500 over 4y, 67% of budgetGRACE FARMS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAerial Investigation Regiment AIR Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetIAWP FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD FOR LIFE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON INC — $3,944 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFriends of Southington Community Services — $2,947 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBELL CITY RIFLE CLUB INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRACK HEROES RYKER
  • Who funds GRACE FARMS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Aerial Investigation Regiment AIR Inc
  • Who funds IAWP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds BREAD FOR LIFE INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHINGTON INC
  • Who funds Friends of Southington Community Services
  • Who funds BELL CITY RIFLE CLUB INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J Allen Lamb & Edward S Pocock III Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • University of Hartford1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to J Allen Lamb & Edward S Pocock III Foundation?

Find your warmest path to J Allen Lamb & Edward S Pocock III Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph