· Private foundation
Its the Heart That Matters Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GATEWAY CHURCH OF VISALIA | $41,250 |
| LIVING WATER WORLD MISSIONS | $29,050 |
| DISCIPLESHIP IN UNEXPECTED WAYS | $3,500 |
| YOUNG LIFE TULARE COUNTY | $3,000 |
| VISALIA RESCUE MISSION | $1,825 |
| FOR OTHERS | $1,700 |
| TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION | $1,200 |
| MISSION NORTHWEST | $1,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| WELLSPRING CHRISTIAN CENTER | $1,000 |
| FOOD LINK TULARE COUNTY | $1,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE SEQUOIAS | $500 |
| HANDS IN THE COMMUNITY | $500 |
| KINGS GOSPEL MISSION | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LWLIVING WATER WORLD MISSIONS3× · 2023–2025 · $79k · revenue +26%
- RHREACHING HIGHER2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +804%
- FOFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…
Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…
To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…
Religious Purposes
Our mission is to serve christ and spread the gospel of his life-changing love through the power of the holy spirit ..."to the ends of the earth". the lord has currently called us to do that through ministry in honduras and the middle east.
Religious
Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.
The mission of world servants is to display gods love to the world through church partnerships and gospel-centered service. the vision of world servants is connect churches in the usa to churches around the world with a shared goal of…
Religious
To make Jesus Christ known and glorified among all nations by proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ to all people. Our passion is calling the lost to receive Jesus Christ as Savior through faith and repentance, equipping the saved to be…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tim Tebow Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Discipleship in Unexpected Ways. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIVING WATER WORLD MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds REACHING HIGHER ↗
- Who funds FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Discipleship In Unexpected Ways ↗
- Who funds VISALIA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BRINEKNIT ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds KINGS RIVER GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Its the Heart That Matters Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.