Skip to content

· Private foundation

Issachar Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MReligion$736kScience & Tech$121kPublic Benefit$111kPhilanthropy$30kCivil Rights$16kCommunity Improvement$10kSocial Science$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $69k
$16,676
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$36,849
University of Texas Austin$16,676
Duke University$15,000
Yale Divinity School$8,233
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Barnabas Stewardship Organizatio: $39k → 9%Barnabas Stewardship Organizatio: $35k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 8 repeat orgs$562k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$1.6M
$525k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+52%

Still filing today

38%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $555k · revenue +49%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $429k · revenue +21%
  • RU
    Rutgers University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $241k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Edinburgh
    one grant, 2020 · $170k
  • CU
    Calvin University Nagel Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $111k
  • AA
    American Association Advancement Science
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
2
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
3
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
4
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
5
Bethel University

We educate and equip students to lead lives of impact through transformative academics in a christ-centered community.

Education
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
8
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
American Baptist Theological Seminary dba American Baptist College

Is to provide educational opportunities for gifted students who have limited academic experiences and resources but unlimited potential for leadership in society.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Biologos Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Barnabas Stewardship Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rutgers University: $241,071 · OtherRutgers UniversityUniversity of Edinburgh: $169,751 · OtherUniversity of EdinburghCLAL - National Jewish Center: $120,050 · OtherCLAL - National Jewish CenterCalvin University Nagel Institute: $111,338 · OtherCalvin University Nagel InstituteYale Divinity School: $100,000 · OtherYale Divinity SchoolAmerican Association Advancement Science: $50,000 · OtherUniversity of Texas Austin: $46,420 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $36,849 · Other+12 more: $160,169 · Other+12 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $555,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $429,405 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC+2 more: $21,653 · EducationBARNABAS STEWARDSHIP ORGANIZATION: $74,206 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR EARLY AFRICAN CHRISTIANITY INC: $25,000 · ReligionTHE BIOLOGOS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · ReligionAMERICAN SCIENTIFIC AFFILIATION: $5,000 · ReligionPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,035,648Education$1,006,058Human Services$74,206Religion$42,500Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $555,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $429,405 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBARNABAS STEWARDSHIP ORGANIZATION: $74,206 over 2y, 49% of budgetCENTER FOR EARLY AFRICAN CHRISTIANITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BIOLOGOS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $11,653 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SCIENTIFIC AFFILIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS STEWARDSHIP ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EARLY AFRICAN CHRISTIANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BIOLOGOS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC AFFILIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Issachar Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Issachar Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Issachar Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Issachar Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Issachar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph