Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Israel Henry Beren Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$4.8MInternational$2.0MReligion$1.8MEducation$1.5MCivil Rights$500kYouth Development$300kOther$4.8M
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $430k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.8M
$250,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,000,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK MED CENR IN JERUSALEM$500,000
COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION$500,000
OHR TORAH STONE$500,000
YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL$250,000
BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$180,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$125,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HILLEL$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER: $18k → 9%CHABAD OF CLINTON: $540 → 16%AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK MED CENR IN JERUSALEM: $1.0M → 17%FEDERATION FO JEWISH COMMUNITIES: $32k → 20%YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL: $250k → 28%JEWISH YOUTH INC: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HILLEL: $36k → 19%COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%BEREN SEA FOUNDATION: $500k → 16%ROSE HILL CEMETERY: $250 → 10%BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $180k → 11%AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK MED CENR IN JERUSALEM: $500k → 17%YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL: $250k → 28%JEWISH COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY FO FLORIDA HILLEL: $18k → 19%BEREN SEA FOUNDATION: $500k → 16%BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $150k → 11%AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK MED CENR IN JERUSALEM: $500k → 17%YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL: $125k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HILLEL: $18k → 19%BEREN SEA FOUNATION: $500k → 16%BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $25k → 11%THE TIKVAH FUND: $650k → 17%YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL: $100k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HILLEL: $18k → 19%BEREN SEA FOUNDATION: $500k → 16%BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $25k → 11%UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK: $100k → 17%YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL: $100k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HILLEL: $18k → 19%FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS: $45k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK: $45k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP: $100k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP: $100k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP: $100k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $1.0M → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $125k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $125k → 17%OHR TORAH STONE: $810k → 17%OHR TORAH STONE: $500k → 17%OHR TORAH STONE: $250k → 17%OHR TORAH STONE: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Israel Henry Beren Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Israel Henry Beren Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 8 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$12M
$947k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+39%

Still filing today

75%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BEREN SEA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +309%
  • OT
    Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +74%
  • YC
    YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST)
    5× · 2020–2024 · $825k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TIKVAH FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $650k · revenue +199%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $145k · revenue +34%
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
2
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
3
Sherit Isroel
4
Bais Yisrael Foundation
5
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
8
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
9
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Jewish Life Foundation
11
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
12
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Beren Sea Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEREN SEA FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyBEREN SEA FOUNDATIONPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,250,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AM…BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $380,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF …+2 more — $190,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $4,600,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM COLLEGE O…+9 more — $197,030 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $2,000,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMI…Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel — $1,810,000 · ReligionOhr Torah Sto…YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST) — $825,000 · EducationYESHIVAT C…THE TIKVAH FUND — $650,000 · EducationTHE TIKVAH…COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC — $300,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$4,820,000Other$4,797,030International$2,000,000Religion$1,810,000Education$1,475,000Civil Rights$500,000Youth Development$300,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $2,000,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetBEREN SEA FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel — $1,810,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $1,250,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST) — $825,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND — $650,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOMBAT HATE FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $380,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $145,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Israel Henry Beren Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Israel Henry Beren Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Israel Henry Beren Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph