Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iskander Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$686kHealth$21kEducation$11kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$3kFood & Nutrition$1kEmployment$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $215k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY CHURCH$214,768
OPEN DOOR MINISTRY OF SAMPSON$1,500
WAYNE COUNTY DAY SCHOOL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$550
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE$500
YMCA$400
ANAPHORA USA$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPEN DOOR MINISTRY OF SAMPSON: $3k → 20%OPEN DOOR MINISTRY OF SAMPSON: $2k → 20%OPEN DOOR MINISTRY OF SAMPSON: $500 → 20%SOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE: $100 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 10 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$687k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+14%

Still filing today

40%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ANAPHORA USA
    2× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +72%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF SAMPSON INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • WP
    WAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $1k · revenue +571%

Funded once

  • AP
    ARENDALE PARROTT ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • SG
    ST GEORGE COPTIC ORTHODOX CH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Methodist College

The college's mission is to train christians to serve god and his church.

Education
2
Conway Christian School

Conway christian school exists to partner with christian families by offering a

Education
3
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
4
Appalachian Bible College Inc

Serving the chrisitan community in the strengthening of local churches, promoting responsible christian character and maturity through educational programs, and preparing graduates for vocational and volunteer church-related service.

—
5
Huntsville Bible College Inc

Prepare individuals to become pastors, evangelists, missionary workers, christian education teachers, and to assist the local church in carrying out its mission.

Education
6
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
7
Wellington Christian Academy Inc

Operate a private school.

Education
8
Covenant Preparatory School Inc

To provide christian based classical eduation

Education
9
Timberline Baptist Camp & Conference Center Inc

Christian retreat center

—
10
Antioch Baptist Church

Church/religious organization

—
11
Precious Community Church

To operate a christian church and to carry on all aspects of the christian ministry

Religion
12
Wooster Christian School Inc

The mission of wooster christian school is to prepare students for the future through excellence in christian education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Cancer Care; the most unlike its peers is Trooper Nolan Sanders Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY CHURCH: $548,961 · OtherST MARY CHURCHST MARK COPTIC ORTHODOX CH: $70,500 · OtherST MARK COPTIC ORTHODOX CHQUEEN STA MARY PRINCE TADROS: $40,500 · OtherQUEEN STA MARY PRINCE TADROS+18 more: $56,202 · Other+18 moreANAPHORA USA: $5,300 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,200 · HealthWAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $1,100 · HealthOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF SAMPSON INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC: $2,400 · EducationWAYNE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC: $500 · EducationTROOPER NOLAN SANDERS FOUNDATION: $500 · Employment
Other$716,163Philanthropy$5,300Health$5,300Human Services$5,100Education$3,900Employment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANAPHORA USA: $5,300 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetOPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF SAMPSON INC: $5,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWAYNE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS TRAIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTROOPER NOLAN SANDERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANAPHORA USA ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MINISTRIES OF SAMPSON INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS TRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds TROOPER NOLAN SANDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT OLIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN CANCER CARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

E J Pope & Son FoundationNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: E J Pope & Son Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iskander Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iskander Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iskander Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph