How much did ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

make wishboys girlsjude children'schildren's researchmultiple sclerosisinternational

2019

valley childrenschildrens healthcaremultiple sclerosisinternationaljude childrenschildrens research

2020

harvestpediatricmultiple sclerosissan

2021

meals wheelssan franciscosisterswomenslittlemake-a-wishinternational

2022

firefood allergyfood bankjude children'schildren's researchsansclerosis

2023

freedomwildfires reliefsan diegohoperescuenorthwestnami

2024

pet rescuehorsesconstructionhumanewwpsankids

2025

bloodwhalebreast cancerstephenyouthwounded warriorsclerosis

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k60 grants · $89k
$50k–250k1 grant · $75k

$1,500

Median grant

States reached

$305k

Total assets

Largest grants

NAMI NATIONAL$75,000
WWP INC - WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$5,250
K9S FOR WARRIORS INC$4,510
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$4,395
STEPHEN BENITO JACOBO FOUNDATION$2,500
LINES FOR LIFE$2,500
TOGETHER WE RISE CORPORATION$2,500
SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT$2,500
FEEDING AMERICA$2,435
SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$2,250
BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC$2,250
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$2,019
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,500
GOOD REASON HOUSTON INC$1,500
MERCY SHIPS$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$973k · 43 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

248

Total granted

$973k

$338k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

+57%

Still filing today

51%

79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NN
NAMI NATIONAL
4× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +129%
FH
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
4× · 2017–2020 · $38k · revenue +32%
FEEDING AMERICA
3× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +77%

Funded once

RT
REBUILDING TOGETHER INC
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -18%
GH
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -4%
RH
RYAN HOUSE
one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Marin Humane Society

Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.

Animals

American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health

The Humane Society for Seattleking

Animal welfare organization

Animals

Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals... feeding san diego is on a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community…

Food & Nutrition

22KILL

To combat the high rate of suicide in veterans & first responders by fostering mental wellness.

Philanthropy

Donor Network West

To save and improve lives through organ and tissue donation for transplantation.

—

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

Santafe Healthcare Inc

To improve the health and well-being of people in the communities we serve.

Health

Petconnect Rescue Inc

Petconnect rescue is a foster-based animal welfare organization dedicated to saving at-risk dogs and cats, providing them with high quality care, and adopting them to loving homes. we are committed to ensuring a highly positive rescue…

Animals

United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

The Wildcat Sanctuary

Provide sanctuary to wild cats in need and inspire change to end the captive wildlife crisis.

Animals

100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alaska & and the most unlike its peers is St Jude Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.4%1/271

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,294

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

256 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

252/256

Grantees still filing

206/256

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$832,477Health$323,195Human Services$57,250Food & Nutrition$52,750International$43,000Animals$37,722Housing & Shelter$20,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA26× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation · California Foundation For · The San Diego Foundation · Synchrony Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

19get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MY SISTERS PLACE WOMENS CENTER FUND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 260501902 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MY SISTERS PLACE WOMENS CENTER FUND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC?

Find your warmest path to ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

256 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC?

More from the funding graph

ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

256 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to ISEC Charitable Foundation aka ISEC?

More from the funding graph