Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving B Kahn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$24kHealth$23kEducation$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kAnimals$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$397k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen$4,000
Steps-Together$2,300
Share$2,000
Covenant House$2,000
Roulette Intermedium Inc$2,000
Montclair Scholarship Fund$2,000
MPAC$1,200
St Jude Childrens Hospital$1,000
Make a Wish Foundation$1,000
K9's for warriors$1,000
Color A Smile$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Make a Wish Foundation: $1k → 11%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen: $4k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $3k → 20%K9's for warriors: $1k → 6%St Jude Childrens Research: $3k → 17%MPAC: $1k → 4%Steps-Together: $2k → 5%Covenant House: $2k → 16%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen: $2k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%K9's for warriors: $1k → 6%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%MPAC: $1k → 4%Covenant House: $1k → 16%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen: $2k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%K9's for warriors: $1k → 6%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%MPAC: $1k → 4%Covenant House: $1k → 16%Share: $3k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%K9's for warriors: $550 → 6%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $1k → 17%MPAC: $1k → 4%Montclair Scholarship Fund: $2k → 16%Share: $2k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%St Jude Childrens Hospital: $550 → 17%MPAC: $1k → 4%Montclair Scholarship Fund: $2k → 16%Share: $2k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%Montclair Scholarship Fund: $2k → 16%Share: $2k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%Montclair Scholarship Fund: $1k → 16%Share: $2k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $2k → 20%Montclair Scholarship Fund: $1k → 16%Share: $2k → 17%Share: $2k → 17%Share: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$75k
$6k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +60%
  • SS
    SHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +109%
  • MONTCLAIR SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • NP
    NJ Pandemic Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SJ
    St Jude Childrens Research
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women in Neuroscience

Women in Neuroscience is building a diverse community of women leaders in neuroscience and neurology through student internships, mentorship, and scholarships.

Education
2
In Concert for Cancer

Present world-class benefit concerts to provide support to cancer organizations committed to helping patients, their families and to cancer discoveries and research.

Health
3
Pink It Forward
Health
4
Royal Dames of Cancer Research Inc

The organization raises funds and makes grants for cancer research.

Health
5
Gabrielle S Cerminaro Art Scholarship Foundation
Education
6
Hearts Who Care Inc

Support cancer research

—
7
Manhasset Women's Coalition Against Breast Cancer Inc

The Coalition funds innovative breast cancer research, increases awareness through education, and provides support services to those with breast cancer and related diseases.

Health
8
Jazz for Prostate Cancer Awareness

Raising Awareness for Prostate Cancer

Health
9
A Cure in Sight

A Cure in Sights mission is to provide funding for patient services for ocular melanoma eye cancer patients education awareness and research.

Health
10
Students Offering Smiles Inc

The development, organization and delivery of events for the public that focus on aiding ill children and lift their spirts during long periods of hospitalization.

Health
11
Pano Koumantaros Cancer Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
12
Pulse of Ny Inc

Dedicated to Raising awareness about patient safety through advocacy education and support

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Color a Smile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $16,500 · Arts & CultureROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INCWOMEN IN VISUAL ARTS INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureWOMEN IN VISUAL ARTS INCMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen: $7,500 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer …MPAC: $5,800 · OtherMPACCovenant House: $4,000 · OtherCovenant HouseNJ Pandemic Fund: $3,100 · OtherNJ Pandemic FundSt Jude Childrens Research: $2,500 · OtherSt Jude Childrens ResearchMake a Wish Foundation: $1,000 · OtherSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC: $16,500 · HealthSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN W…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,550 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH…MONTCLAIR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,600 · PhilanthropyMONTCLAIR SCH…Steps Together A NJ Non Profit: $2,300 · PhilanthropySteps Togethe…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $3,550 · AnimalsCOLOR A SMILE: $750 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$26,000Other$23,900Health$20,050Philanthropy$9,900Animals$3,550Human Services$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $16,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC: $16,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN VISUAL ARTS INC: $9,500 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetMONTCLAIR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $3,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSteps Together A NJ Non Profit: $2,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOLOR A SMILE: $750 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN VISUAL ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTCLAIR SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Steps Together A NJ Non Profit ↗
  • Who funds COLOR A SMILE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving B Kahn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving B Kahn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Irving B Kahn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph