Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$451k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of IRVING AND DOROTHY ROM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $270k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE$100,000
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION$70,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE$50,000
THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
THE UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$30,000
IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC$20,000
NAMI ILLINOIS$20,000
THRESHOLDS$20,000
THE KENNEDY FORUM ILLINOIS$20,000
GOLDA MEIR HOUSE MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$10,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$10,000
AMERICAN BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE INTERFAITH TRUST & HARMONY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC: $20k → 6%ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE: $100k → 17%THE UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $30k → 14%FOUNDATION TO ADVANCE INTERFAITH TRUST & HARMONY: $1k → 11%AMERICAN BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%GOLDA MEIR HOUSE MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 12%AMITA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $70k → 7%ABBH ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $70k → 7%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE: $100k → 17%NATIONAL REGISTER OF HEALTH SERVICE PROFESSIONALS: $5k → 14%ABBH ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $70k → 7%THE KENNEDY FORUM ILLINOIS: $20k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $50k → 11%ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE: $100k → 17%AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%AMITA ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $53k → 7%THE KENNEDY FORUM ILLINOIS: $20k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE: $100k → 17%AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%THE KENNEDY FORUM ILLINOIS: $20k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE: $100k → 17%AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $70k → 14%THRESHOLDS: $20k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $70k → 14%THRESHOLDS: $10k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $22k → 11%AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $70k → 14%THRESHOLDS: $10k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $20k → 11%ADAS ISREAL CONGREGATION: $35k → 14%THRESHOLDS: $10k → 14%THRESHOLDS: $10k → 14%NAMI ILLINOIS: $20k → 14%NAMI ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%NAMI ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%NAMI ILLIONOIS: $5k → 14%MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE - KENNEDY FORUM: $15k → 14%C21 WOMEN'S ENSEMBLE: $221 → 14%MAKE-A-WISH (ILLINOIS): $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 9 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+31%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $385k · revenue +26%
  • TT
    THE THRESHOLDS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +38%
  • NI
    NAMI ILLINOIS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +288%

Funded once

  • AH
    AMITA HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • AA
    AMITA ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $53k
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE - KENNEDY FORUM
    one grant, 2024 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Psychological Association

American psychological association is a national membership organization created to promote the advancement, communication, and application of psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. apa fulfills these…

Social Science
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
American Psychiatric Association

The american psychiatric association (apa) was incorporated in 2000 as a 501(c)(6) trade association. its 38,000 u.s. and international physician members specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health and disorders, including…

Community Improvement
4
Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis Los Angeles

The institute of contemporary psychoanalysis was formed in 1990 to offer mental health professionals, as well as scholars and professionals from other fields, the opportunity to study the full scope of psychoanalytic theory and clinical…

Education
5
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

10
Institute for Psychoanalytic Education

The mission of the institute for psychoanalytic education (d/b/a the psychoanalytic assiciation of new york, "pany") is to promote mental health through advanced clinical training, treatment, and scholarship.

Education
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Illinois Inc and the most unlike its peers is C21 Womens Ensemble. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCE — $500,000 · OtherACWIS - NATIONAL OFFICE SCIENCEABBH ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION — $140,000 · OtherABBH ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATIONPRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE — $91,511 · OtherPRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFEAMITA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherAMITA HEALTH FOUNDATIONTHE THRESHOLDS — $60,000 · OtherTHE THRESHOLDSTHE KENNEDY FORUM ILLINOIS — $60,000 · OtherTHE KENNEDY FORUM ILLINOISAMITA ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION — $52,571 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · Other+7 more — $78,900 · Other+7 moreAMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $385,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL F…The Trustees of Princeton University — $200,000 · EducationThe Trustees …THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $10,000 · EducationAmerican Board of Professional Psychology Foundati — $10,000 · EducationNAMI ILLINOIS INC — $45,000 · HealthThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $30,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $221 · Arts & CultureIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,102,982Social Science$385,000Education$220,000Health$45,000Arts & Culture$30,221Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $385,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI ILLINOIS INC — $45,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Board of Professional Psychology Foundati — $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS
  • Who funds NAMI ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds American Board of Professional Psychology Foundati
  • Who funds C21 Womens Ensemble
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph