Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$451k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2025
8
Organizations funded FY2024
13%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 9
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
7
Total assets, FY2025
$6.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 13% of the organizations Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$431k50%
FY20248$300k13%
FY20238$357k25%
FY20227$343k43%
FY20219$353kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$580kScience & Tech$500kReligion$285kEducation$260kPublic Benefit$60kArts & Culture$50kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Psychological Foundation$385,00052%
The Trustees of Princeton University$200,00030%
The Thresholds$60,00050%
Nami Illinois Inc$45,00042%
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum$30,00010%
American Board of Professional Psychology Foundati$10,000124%
The Art Institute of Chicago$10,00010%
Foundation to Advance Interfaith Trust & Harmony$1,0001n/a
C21 Womens Ensemble$2211n/a
Make-A-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc$10010%

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.0M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Psychological Foundation: $385,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Thresholds: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNami Illinois Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Board of Professional Psychology Foundati: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetThe Art Institute of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation

How much does Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation give?
Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation reported 15 grants totaling $451,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 9 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (32%), Science & Tech (28%), Religion (16%).
Who are Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: American Psychological Foundation ($385k), The Trustees of Princeton University ($200k), The Thresholds ($60k).
Does Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation based?
Irving and Dorothy Rom Charitable Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving and Dorothy Rom’s filings →

More from the funding graph