Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving & Dorothy Levy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$12MPublic Benefit$3.6MHealth$1.4MReligion$1.1MArts & Culture$515kPhilanthropy$250kEnvironment$180kAnimals$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $5.5M
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW FOUNDATION - PHILLIP A LEVY ENGINEERING HALL$5,000,000
UW FOUNDATION - L&S BUILDING$500,000
MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION$50,000
UW FOUNDATION - CARBONE CANCER CENTER$35,000
ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
UW FOUNDATION - WAISMAN CENTER$25,000
UW FOUNDATION - DEPT OF OPTHAMOLOGY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
UW FOUNDATION - DEPT OF UROLOGY$15,000
BETH ISRAEL CENTER$10,000
JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES$10,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICE: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICE: $5k → 10%GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 10%YMCA OF DANE COUNTY: $5k → 10%YMCA OF DANE COUNTY: $5k → 10%YMCA OF DANE COUNTY: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 47 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
3

Total granted

$20M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+43%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $170k · revenue +101%
  • LN
    LITERACY NETWORK INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $170k · revenue +101%
  • MS
    MADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $150k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • VO
    VILLAGE OF MAPLE BLUFF- MBCC PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $65k
  • WY
    WISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • MO
    MADISON OPERA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison Community Foundation

Madison community foundation will engage greater madison in philanthropy to advance a more vibrant and equitable community.

Philanthropy
2
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
3
Madison Community Hospital

Madison regional health system serves as a community health focal point through the provision of compassionate, quality, and innovative care.

Health
4
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.

—
5
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
6
Madison Development Corporation

Madison development corporation (mdc)'s mission is to help create jobs by providing gap financing to small businesses and to develop and finance quality, affordable workforce housing units in madison and the dane county area.

Community Improvement
7
Madison Art Gallery
—
8
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
9
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through meaningful relationships built on gratitude and philanthropy.

Health
10
Madison Community Cooperative

Madison community cooperative's mission is to improve the madison community by providing low-cost, not-for-profit cooperative housing for very low to moderate income people and to be inclusive of underrepresented and marginalized groups.

Education
11
Dane County Parent Council Inc

Dane county parent council changes the lives of underserved children and families through education and supportive services.

Education
12
Madison County Development Group

To attract businesses to locate in madison county, iowa

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Irwin a and Robert D Goodman Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UW FOUNDATION - PHILLIP A LEVY ENGINEERING HALL: $10,000,000 · OtherUW FOUNDATION - PHILLIP A LEVY ENGINEERING HALLUW FOUNDATION - L&S BUILDING: $5,000,000 · OtherUW FOUNDATION - L&S BUILDING+39 more: $3,731,700 · Other+39 moreMADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · EducationLITERACY NETWORK INC: $170,000 · EducationMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $360,000 · HealthMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON OPERA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $120,000 · AnimalsTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $30,000 · Food & NutritionPORCHLIGHT INC: $55,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$18,731,700Education$390,000Health$360,000Arts & Culture$285,000Animals$120,000Food & Nutrition$65,000Housing & Shelter$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $360,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRHINELANDER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 8y, 47% of budgetMADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK INC: $170,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetDANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $120,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPORCHLIGHT INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON ROTARY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $27,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetIRWIN A AND ROBERT D GOODMAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Dane County Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE MADISON INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON OPERA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds RHINELANDER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Community FoundationWI34.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Evjue Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · John J Frautschi Family Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Sub-Zero Group Foundation Inc · Pleasant T Rowland Foundation Inc · Trustage Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving & Dorothy Levy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving & Dorothy Levy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Irving & Dorothy Levy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph