Skip to content

· Private foundation

Irving & Beatrice C Edison Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$167kHealth$107kEducation$86kReligion$56kAnimals$40kArts & Culture$16kFood & Nutrition$10kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS$20,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$15,000
MISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$5,000
THE GATHERING$4,000
BARNES-JEWISH HOPITAL FOUNDATIONS$3,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,500
THINK PINK ROCKS$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY$1,000
DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
HELPING STRAYS OF MONROE COUNTY$1,000
SOPHIE'S FOUNDATION INC$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK$500
COMPASSION & CHOICES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $1k → 8%OUR LADY'S INN: $1k → 21%OUR LADY'S INN: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
RI
MO
VA
AR
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$484k · 41 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
18

Total granted

$484k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+19%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $31k · revenue +79%
  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +16% · 61% of their budget
  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRIDGE - THE MERRYSTARKEY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • PS
    Pride St Louis Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +56%
  • CT
    Chakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFPgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
2
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
3
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
4
The Missouri Foundation for Health

To eliminate underlying causes of health inequities, transform systems and enable individuals and communities to thrive

Health
5
University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis

The university's mission is to educate and advance communities of discovery to foster a healthier society.

Education
6
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

—
7
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
8
St Louis Art Museum Foundation

The sole purpose of the foundation is to support the saint louis art museum, including but not limited to fundraising and other activities and assisting in financing expansion and renovation of its facilities.

Arts & Culture
9
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
10
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
11
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Shriners Hospital for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
21/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS - FORT SMITH: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS - FORT SMITHTHE GATHERING: $41,000 · OtherTHE GATHERINGBARNES-JEWISH HOPITAL FOUNDATIONS: $34,250 · OtherBARNES-JEWISH HOPITAL FOUNDATIONSTEMPLE EMANUEL: $18,300 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $14,000 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATIONJUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY: $9,000 · Other+42 more: $68,284 · Other+42 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $131,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS IN…SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $16,500 · PhilanthropySHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN+1 more: $600 · PhilanthropyGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $30,500 · AnimalsBELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $1,650 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsMISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25,500 · HealthNAMI National: $6,000 · Health+2 more: $1,100 · HealthJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $13,000 · EducationST LOUIS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,250 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalDignity Period: $500 · InternationalDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $6,750 · Science & TechST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $750 · Science & Tech
Other$254,834Philanthropy$148,100Animals$37,150Health$32,600Education$14,250International$8,500Science & Tech$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $131,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $30,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $16,500 over 7y, 61% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $6,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEARLY AMERICAN COPPERSINC: $3,400 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $2,835 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPride St Louis Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $1,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $1,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,260 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,230 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetClarion West: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHINK PINK ROCKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDIABETES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetClayton Community Foundation: $600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Period: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO ARTS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY PET GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EARLY AMERICAN COPPERSINC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADYS INN ↗
  • Who funds Pride St Louis Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Chakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP ↗
  • Who funds Clarion West ↗
  • Who funds THINK PINK ROCKS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Centene Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Julian I & Hope R Edison Foundation Inc · Sawyer & Jean Marglous Foundation · Leon and Mary Strauss Charitable Foundation · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Irving & Beatrice C Edison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Irving & Beatrice C Edison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Diabetes Foundation Inc: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Irving & Beatrice C Edison Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Irving & Beatrice C Edison Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Irving & Beatrice C Edison’s filings →

More from the funding graph