Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iron Mountain Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$21kEducation$11kReligion$3kEmployment$3kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$2kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$442k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTHERS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
MENTORS INTERNATIONAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WESTRIDGE ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DESERT MANNA FOOD PANTY: $2k → 11%IMPACT LAOS: $2k → 8%THE POST OAK CLUB: $2k → 16%HEART OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%MENTORS INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 6%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%WILFORD WOODRUFF PAPERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%HEBER VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL: $500 → 14%SYNERGIES WORK: $3k → 13%YMCA: $2k → 14%DESERET INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 8%LDS HUMANITARIAN: $5k → 8%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%MOTHERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER: $3k → 8%COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE: $4k → 8%HUNTSMAN CANCER HOSPITAL: $15k → 8%WESTRIDGE ACADEMY: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Solar Electric Light Fund

Solar Electric Light Fund (SELF) provides solar power and wireless communications to the fifth of the world's population living in energy poverty to meet global challenges of food and water scarcity, basic healthcare and poverty. SELF is…

Environment
2
Mother Africa

Mother Africa supports African immigrant and refugee women and their families to reach their highest potential. Committed to building leadership, advocacy and community action capacity to reduce barriers to health, education.....

Human Services
3
Water By Women

Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.

Human Services
4
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
5
One Days Wages

One Day's Wages is a movement of people, stories, and actions to alleviate extreme global poverty. One Day's Wages promotes awareness, invites giving, and supports sustainable relief through partnerships, especially with smaller…

International
6
Mission Without Borders Incorporated

Mission Without Borders (MWB) is dedicated to reaching people for Christ through an international network of Christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,…

International
7
Women of the World

Women of the World assists women refugees, asylum seekers, and immigrants from all nations achieve self-reliance, economic empowerment, and a voice in our community through capacity building, customized services, and advocacy.

International
8
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
9
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
10
Humanity for Relief and Development Inc

The Organization is a nonprofit organization on a mission to build sustainable bakeries and kitchens around the world, providing free daily bread and warm, nutritious meals to underserved communities fostering hope while empowering…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Water for South Sudan Inc

Water for South Sudan delivers direct, transformative and sustainable quality-of-life service to the people of South Sudan by efficiently providing access to clean, safe water and improving hygiene practices in areas of great need.

International
12
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of America Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Impact Laos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUNTSMAN CANCER HOSPITAL: $15,000 · OtherHUNTSMAN CANCER HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTRIDGE ACADEMY: $5,000 · OtherWESTRIDGE ACADEMYCOMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE: $4,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY NURSING SERVICECHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER: $3,000 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTERYMCA: $2,000 · OtherTHE POST OAK CLUB: $1,500 · OtherDESERT MANNA FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,500 · Other+2 more: $1,500 · OtherMentors International: $5,000 · InternationalMentors Int…IMPACT LAOS: $2,000 · InternationalIMPACT LAOSMothers Without Borders: $5,000 · HealthHEART OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSalt Lake Education Foundation: $4,500 · PhilanthropySynergies Work Inc: $2,500 · EmploymentWILFORD WOODRUFF PAPERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$43,500International$7,000Health$5,000Community Improvement$5,000Philanthropy$4,500Employment$2,500Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMentors International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSalt Lake Education Foundation: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSynergies Work Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWILFORD WOODRUFF PAPERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT LAOS: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetDESERT MANNA FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRUBY'S RAINBOW: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iron Mountain Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iron Mountain Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iron Mountain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph