Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America

We are the leading voice of the post-9/11 generation of veterans, and we believe the dynamic men and women of our community represent america's future, our next greatest generation.

$475k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION$100,000
LADY VETERANS CONNECT INC$75,000
ACTIVE HEROES INC$75,000
AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS$50,000
FORGOTTEN NOT GONE INC$50,000
PURPLE HEART HOMES INC$50,000
SPARTA INC$25,000
MODERN MILITARY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$25,000
MINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICA$25,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%ACTIVE HEROES INC: $75k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vetality Corp

Services for veterans

2
Vets Community Connections

The VCC mission is to assist veterans, military, and their families in successfully integrating into their community by connecting them with local individuals and organizations that can assist them in building thriving lives.

3
Hookin Veterans
Public Benefit
4
Home for Veterans Network Launch
Public Benefit
5
Pearl With You

To provide a comprehensive range of services to address the unique challenges that veterans face, with a focus on eradicating veteran homelessness.

Community Improvement
6
American Veterans Assistance Group of California
Community Improvement
7
At Liberty Connections
Health
8
Veterans & Military Listening Post

Providing organized support to vetrans

9
American Soldier

To give assistance to discharged military veterans and their families.

Human Services
10
Womens Influential Network Foundati

Offer mentoring to army women minorities

Civil Rights
11
Ascending Career Solutions Group Inc

Counseling for veteran issues relationships and career guidance

12
Heroes Linked

Successfully assists veterans, service members in transition, military spouses, and Gold Star families with post-military career success through the Heroes Network program as well as providing awareness of veterans issues.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caring for Military Families the Elizabeth Dole Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Forgotten Not Gone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Public BenefitCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATIONLADY VETERANS CONNECT — $75,000 · Public BenefitLADY VETERANS CONNECTPURPLE HEART HOMES INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitPURPLE HEART HOMES INCMINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICA — $25,000 · Public BenefitMINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICAACTIVE HEROES INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesACTIVE HEROES INCAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS — $50,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERSForgotten Not Gone — $50,000 · HealthForgotten N…Modern Military Association of America — $25,000 · Civil RightsModern Mili…SPART A INC — $25,000 · Civil RightsSPART A INC
Public Benefit$250,000Human Services$125,000Health$50,000Civil Rights$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLADY VETERANS CONNECT — $75,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetACTIVE HEROES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetForgotten Not Gone — $50,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPURPLE HEART HOMES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMINORITY VETERANS OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph