Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ira & Sheila Stone Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$247k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$772kHuman Services$216kHousing & Shelter$166kArts & Culture$111kPhilanthropy$77kReligion$38kEducation$31kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNCIL JEWISH ELDERLY$110,000
ALL CHICAGO$25,000
EISENHOWER HEARING FOUNDATION$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE DESERT$15,000
GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION$13,000
PS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC$12,377
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$10,000
JONATHAN PHILIP REDER FUND$10,000
MILLENIUM PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL$5,000
DEBORAH'S PLACE$5,000
CARE FOR REAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,888
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MARTHA'S VILLAGE & KITCHEN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $20k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $20k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $20k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $20k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $5k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $2k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $1k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $1k → 14%CARE FOR REAL: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 23 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
31

Total granted

$1.7M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+102%

Still filing today

22%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $161k · revenue +475%
  • GP
    GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +95%
  • CARE FOR REAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • II
    IMPACT ISREAL
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CE
    CHUCK EVANS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
2
Chicago's Environmental Fund
—
3
Covenant House Chicago
—
4
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
5
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation is a separate 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that also serves as the strategic partner for the coordination of fundraising and charitable resources for the Chicago Park District.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Richard H Driehaus Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Onechicagofund

The organization is organized and will be operated exclusively for charitable, literary, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of code section 501(c)(3), including for such purposes, but not limited to, the promotion of…

—
10
Chicago Chesed Fund

To raise and distribute funds, goods, food, and assistance to the poverty-stricken in the jewish community.

Human Services
11
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grant Park Orchestral Association; the most unlike its peers is Evans Scholars Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER: $750,496 · OtherEISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTERAUSL: $301,300 · OtherAUSLCOUNCIL JEWISH ELDERLY: $130,000 · OtherCOUNCIL JEWISH ELDERLY+48 more: $388,351 · Other+48 moreALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $161,000 · Housing & ShelterALL CHICAG…+1 more: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $80,000 · Human ServicesCARE FOR REAL: $9,500 · Human ServicesGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $26,880 · Arts & CultureEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,310 · EducationMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,570,147Housing & Shelter$166,000Human Services$89,500Arts & Culture$26,880Education$12,310Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $161,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $26,880 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FOR REAL: $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,310 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOR REAL ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ira & Sheila Stone Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ira & Sheila Stone Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ira & Sheila Stone Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ira & Sheila Stone Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ira & Sheila Stone Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph