Skip to content

· Public charity

Iqair Foundation

Established for the purpose of community education on clean air and providing air filtration systems to schools, charities and community organizations.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
98
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$713k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$15MEducation$476kHuman Services$201kAnimals$1kCommunity Improvement$589Health$289Arts & Culture$222
02FY2024 · 98 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k83 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $881k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$19,656
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$713,299
OTHER SCHOOL SITES$436,864
DESERT MIRAGE HIGH SCHOOL$129,608
OAKLAND HIGH SCHOOL$77,001
PLACER HIGH SCHOOL$75,984
VALLE DEL SOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$73,124
TORO CANYON MIDDLE SCHOOL$68,773
ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT$64,217
MOUNTAIN VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$61,526
CALEXICO HIGH SCHOOL$61,345
FREMONT HIGH SCHOOL$56,585
OAKLAND TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL$54,739
BOBBY DUKE MIDDLE SCHOOL$53,314
PALM VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$52,399
SKYLINE HIGH SCHOOL$52,047
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $94k → 6%KIPP BRIDGE ACADEMY: $247k → 10%Sea View Elementary: $218k → 21%MCCLYMONDS HIGH SCHOOL: $200k → 10%West Shores High School: $171k → 21%Prescott ES: $112k → 10%PLACER HIGH SCHOOL: $76k → 6%OUSD MARTIN LUTHER KIND JR ES: $104k → 10%OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $92k → 10%Saul Martinez Extension: $221k → 11%OUSD MARTIN LUTHER KIND JR ES: $78k → 10%CVUSD MECCA EXTENSION: $215k → 11%ESPERANZA STONEHURST ES: $84k → 14%PRESCOTT ES: $76k → 10%OTHER SCHOOL SITES: $675k → 14%OTHER SCHOOL SITES: $437k → 14%OTHER SCHOOL SITES: $264k → 14%OTHER SCHOOL SITES: $236k → 14%OTHER SCHOOL SITES: $234k → 14%ST MARY'S CENTER: $188k → 14%CESAR CHAVEZ COMPLEXTHINK COLLEGE NOW: $150k → 14%SEQUOIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $85k → 14%OAKLAND HIGH SCHOOL: $84k → 10%OAKLAND HIGH SCHOOL: $77k → 10%Valle del Sol ES Extension: $195k → 11%Cahuilla Desert Academy Extension: $171k → 11%BOBBY DUKE MIDDLE SCHOOL: $99k → 11%CALEXICO HIGH SCHOOL: $144k → 21%REDWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $90k → 10%HESD HERBER SCHOOL 4-8: $86k → 21%Madison MS: $147k → 10%Sobrante Park: $112k → 10%Las Palmitas Extension: $221k → 11%John Kelley Elementary School: $187k → 11%Brookfield ES: $112k → 10%Oasis Extension: $173k → 11%Westside Extension: $162k → 11%Esperanza Stonehurst: $81k → 10%DESERT MIRAGE HIGH SCHOOL: $130k → 11%OUSD FRUITVALE ELEMENTARY: $171k → 10%DESERT MIRAGE HIGH SCHOOL: $110k → 11%Seeley Union ES: $108k → 21%CVUSD DESERT MIRAGE HIGH SCHOOL: $107k → 11%BURCKHALTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $99k → 10%ALLENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $105k → 14%OUSD NEW HIGHLAND ACADEMY: $132k → 10%Oakland Unified School District EnC: $112k → 10%Lighthouse Academy: $111k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IN
PA
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
AZ
AR
NC
SC
HI
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.7M · 90 repeat orgs$5.8M to everyone else

90 repeat relationships: 63 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
145

Total granted

$9.7M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+295%

Still filing today

1%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OTHER SCHOOL SITES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M
  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $431k
  • CV
    Coachella Valley Unified School District
    4× · 2022–2025 · $417k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $221k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $221k
  • OM
    OUSD MARTIN LUTHER KIND JR ES
    one grant, 2020 · $201k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
2
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
Silicon Valley Canaan Evergreen Academy
Education
5
Turlock Education Opportunity Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
6
California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance

To create a california where balancing economic growth and environmental protection is not only a vision, but also a reality.

—
7
Breathe California of the Bay Area Golden Gate and Central Coast

As the local clean air and healthy lungs leader, breathe california of the bay area fights lung disease in all its forms and works with our communities to promote lung health.

—
8
The Judahh Project
Human Services
9
Bridge California

Education

Education
10
California Health M R C
Community Improvement
11
Californians for Energy and Science

To provide californians with accurate, science-based information about energy and climate issues, enabling informed decision-making for our state's energy future. we believe that through education and transparent research, we can help…

Education
12
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central California Asthma Collaborative; the most unlike its peers is Global Nest Exotic Bird Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 266 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTHER SCHOOL SITES: $1,845,552 · OtherOTHER SCHOOL SITESIndividual grant recipient: $713,299 · Other+196 more: $12,845,739 · Other+196 moreRANCHO MIRAGE HIGH SCHOOL INSTRUMENTAL: $65,324 · EducationGlobal Nest Exotic Bird Sanctuary: $1,270 · Animals
Other$15,404,590Education$65,324Animals$1,270

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARY'S CENTER: $200,974 over 3y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARY'S CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iqair Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iqair Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iqair Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Iqair Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 266 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.5M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iqair’s filings →

    More from the funding graph