Skip to content
Ip Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ip Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$257kHuman Services$61kFood & Nutrition$34kEducation$12kHealth$11kInternational$8kPhilanthropy$4kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k60 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$540
Median grant
4
States reached
$494k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG ISRAEL OF WOODMERE$15,000
TOMCHEI SHABBOS YAD YESHAYA$9,500
CHABAD OF THE 5 TOWNS$6,500
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$6,260
ACHIEZER$5,600
Individual grant recipient$5,350
GLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE$5,000
HALB$4,300
BNOS BAIS YAAKOV$3,600
Individual grant recipient$2,500
YOUNG ISRAEL OF LAWRENCE-CEDARHURST$2,040
CONG BETH SHALOM RABBI'S CHARITY FUND$2,000
ONE ISRAEL FUND$1,900
Individual grant recipient$1,800
SHOR YOSHUV INSTITUTE$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AVIGDORS HELPING HAND: $2k → 13%BLUE CARD: $1k → 17%AVIGDOR'S HELPING HAND: $2k → 13%AVIGDORS HELPING HAND: $1k → 13%AVIGDORS HELPING HAND: $1k → 13%AVIGDORS HELPING HAND: $1k → 13%YAD CHAYA: $1k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $252 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $100 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $72 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $72 → 11%PROJECT EZRA: $180 → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $150 → 17%PROJECT EZRA: $100 → 17%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $500 → 20%A TIME: $460 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $250 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $180 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $180 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $180 → 20%A TIME: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $180 → 20%A TIME: $180 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $180 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $8k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $7k → 6%KEREN ANIYEM: $180 → 20%ACHIEZER: $6k → 6%KIMPATORIN AID: $100 → 20%KEREN ANIYEM: $154 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $4k → 6%A TIME: $100 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $4k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $4k → 6%ACHIEZER: $3k → 6%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $72 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $72 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $72 → 20%ACHIEZER: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 6%ACHIEZER: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 76 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
54

Total granted

$348k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+14%

Still filing today

42%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +316%
  • AC
    ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +58%
  • AH
    AVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • KZ
    KEHILLAS ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • HA
    HEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HA
    HEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG ISLAND
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
5
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
6
Yad Elka Inc

To provide funds for jewish occasions to help large families in need primarily in israel

Food & Nutrition
7
Noam Shabbos Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel

Religion
8
Humanitarian Partnership for Israel

Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide

Philanthropy
9
Smach Zevilin of Ny Inc

To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
12
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
33/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF THE 5 TOWNS: $69,810 · OtherCHABAD OF THE 5 TOWNSKEHILLAS ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE: $25,600 · OtherKEHILLAS ZICHRON MEIR MOSHEYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $22,360 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAHNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $21,700 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELTHE LEON MAYER FUND INC: $16,660 · OtherHALB: $16,500 · OtherTOMCHEI SHABBOS 5 TOWNS: $15,110 · Other+109 more: $153,038 · Other+109 moreDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $31,140 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL…ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $12,900 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMU…AVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC: $6,300 · Human ServicesAVIGDORS HELPI…+10 more: $6,506 · Human Services+10 moreTOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $1,242 · Food & NutritionUSA OUTREACH: $4,800 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,800 · ReligionSAMCHAINU INC: $1,800 · ReligionKOLLEL YERUSHALAYIM: $1,200 · ReligionZAKA NORTH INC: $1,050 · Religion+1 more: $360 · ReligionGLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EducationBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $3,780 · EducationTHE LEVI YITZCHAK FAMILY CENTER INC: $1,200 · EducationSharsheret Inc: $3,100 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $2,760 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,680 · HealthONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $2,960 · InternationalKULANU INC: $1,480 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,422 · InternationalOHEL AVRAHAM: $592 · International
Other$340,778Human Services$56,846Food & Nutrition$15,242Religion$11,010Education$9,980Health$7,540International$6,454

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $31,140 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LEON MAYER FUND INC: $16,660 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $12,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC: $6,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUSA OUTREACH: $4,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $3,780 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $3,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $2,960 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $2,760 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMCHAINU INC: $1,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADRAIGOS INC: $1,620 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $1,492 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKULANU INC: $1,480 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,422 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $1,242 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEVI YITZCHAK FAMILY CENTER INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $1,196 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,072 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $970 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $920 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM: $812 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $720 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS & NASSAU COUNTY INC: $680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $613 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHEL AVRAHAM: $592 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMATAN B'SETER BAMBIINC: $504 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $496 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezra: $430 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN TORAH: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $352 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $334 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR THE RESOLUTION OF AGUNOT INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTSQ INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEON MAYER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds USA OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMCHAINU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundF G FoundationMzl 40 FoundationAlyad Foundation IncCross River Community…Damar Foundation IncThe Margules Foundati…The Hirsch Family Cha…The Ganger Foundation…The Basch Family Foun…Allen I Gross Charita…
Jewish Communal FundNY48× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · F G Foundation · Mzl 40 Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · Damar Foundation Inc · The Margules Foundation Inc · The Hirsch Family Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ganger Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ip Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ip Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ip’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home