Skip to content

· Public charity

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Action Fund

The mission of IOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ACTION FUND is to build economic, racial, and environmental justice and grassroots democracy through community organizing, education, advocacy, and electoral politics in iowa and across the country.

$20k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Civil Rights$200kEnvironment$59kPublic Benefit$29kEmployment$20k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DES MOINES BLACK LIBERATION COLLECTIVE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN DREAMS: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation Inc

Interfaith alliance is a growing network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill america's promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but…

Religion
2
Greater Des Moines Partnership Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Iowans for Ukrainians
Philanthropy
4
Lavender Legal Center

Public interest law firm

Crime & Legal
5
Des Moines Black Liberation Movement Collective dba Dsm Blm Collective

The Des Moines Black Liberation Movement (DSM BLM Collective) was formally incorporated on October 3, 2021, though its roots trace back to the days following the murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020. The organization was founded to…

—
6
Great Plains Action Society

We address the trauma that indigenous peoples and the earth face and work to prevent further colonial capitalist violence by fighting for and building power in indigenous communities through rematriation, healing justice and bringing in a…

Civil Rights
7
One Iowa Action

One iowa action, the state's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) advocacy organization, is dedicated to supporting full equality for lgbt individuals living in iowa through grassroots organizing and advocacy.

Civil Rights
8
Alliance for a Better Iowa

To bring about civic betterments and social improvements by advocating for public policies that further social and racial justice, affordable health care, equitable taxation, quality education, a healthy climate, and other changes…

Civil Rights
9
Justice for All Nw Iowa Chapter

Promote justice by linking together christians with ministries.

Human Services
10
Des Moines Area Association of Realtors Foundation
Education
11
Interfaith Voices for Repro

Education and Advocacy We are an Organization of Interfaith and Progressive voices dedicated to affirming the moral authority of black women and girls

Civil Rights
12
Iowa City Area Development Group Inc

The organization promotes, develops and advances the business community in iowa city and the surrounding area. in addition, the organization connects business and industry with federal, state and local resources to enable and stimulate…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indigenous Iowa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Americans for Democratic Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIGENOUS IOWA INC: $59,000 · OtherINDIGENOUS IOWA INCDES MOINES BLACK LIBERATION MOVEMENT FOUNDATION dba DSM BLM Foundation: $44,000 · OtherDES MOINES BLACK LIBERATION MOVEMENT FOUNDATION dba DSM BL…IOWA CITY CATHOLIC WORKER URBAN AND RURAL LAND TRUST: $20,000 · OtherIOWA CITY CATHOLIC WORKER URBAN AND RURAL LAND TRUSTDES MOINES BLACK LIBERATION COLLECTIVE: $20,000 · OtherDES MOINES BLACK LIBERATION COLLECTIVEQUAD CITIES INTERFAITH: $15,000 · OtherQUAD CITIES INTERFAITHPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $80,591 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTEAdvocates for Social Justice Inc: $30,000 · Civil RightsAdvocates f…AMERICANS FOR DEMOCRATIC ACTION INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitURBAN DREAMS: $14,000 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH ALLIANCE OF IOWA: $10,000 · Religion
Other$158,000Community Improvement$80,591Civil Rights$30,000Public Benefit$15,000Human Services$14,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $80,591 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINDIGENOUS IOWA INC: $59,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAdvocates for Social Justice Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetAMERICANS FOR DEMOCRATIC ACTION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetQUAD CITIES INTERFAITH: $15,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetURBAN DREAMS: $14,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINTERFAITH ALLIANCE OF IOWA: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iowa Citizens for Community ImprovementIA14.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Action Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Action Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Action Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Action Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement Action’s filings →

    More from the funding graph