Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Iowa Beef Cattle Producers Association Dba Iowa Beef Industry Council

The organization is dedicated to expanding consumer demand for beef, strengthening beef's position in the global marketplace, and improving producer profitability.

$1.5M
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$397k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of IOWA BEEF CATTLE PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION DBA IOWA BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $312k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $436k
  • $250k+2 grants · $742k
$25,726
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION$397,200
NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION$344,596
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$162,341
PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL$93,737
LEARFIELD COMMUNICATIONS$78,500
NEW YORK BEEF COUNCIL$51,000
IOWA STATE FOUNDATION$50,000
ZESTFUL KITCKEN$34,300
IOWA AGRICULTURAL LITERACY FOUNDATION$31,500
IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION$30,000
ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL$25,726
WORLD FOOD PRIZE$25,000
IOWA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$24,250
GATE HOUSE PICTURE$23,076
COALITION TO SUPPORT IOWA FARMERS$23,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL: $67k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL: $125k → 13%HAWAII BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL: $50k → 15%NEW YORK BEEF COUNCIL: $150k → 16%FLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL: $45k → 13%IOWA AGRICULTURAL LITERACY FOUNDATION: $32k → 5%IOWA STATE FOUNDATION: $250k → 17%NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION: $609k → 8%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $397k → 12%ILLINOIS BEEF ASSOCIATION: $30k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT IRBANA-CHAMPAIGN: $86k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $47k → 13%ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL: $62k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL: $116k → 13%HAWAII BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL: $50k → 15%NEW YORK BEEF COUNCIL: $150k → 16%IOWA AGRICULTURAL LITERACY FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%IOWA STATE FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION: $592k → 8%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $357k → 12%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $38k → 13%ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL: $47k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL: $100k → 13%HAWAII BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL: $30k → 15%NEW YORK BEEF COUNCIL: $128k → 16%FLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL: $150k → 13%IOWA STATE FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION: $591k → 8%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $342k → 12%ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL: $33k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL: $94k → 13%NEW YORK BEEF COUNCIL: $29k → 16%FLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL: $60k → 13%WORLD FOOD PRIZE: $25k → 10%ZESTFUL KITCKEN: $34k → 17%NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION: $551k → 8%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $209k → 12%ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL: $26k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL: $80k → 13%NEW YORK BEEF COUNCIL: $51k → 16%WORLD FOOD PRIZE: $25k → 10%NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION: $345k → 8%US MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION: $100k → 12%WORLD FOOD PRIZE: $25k → 10%ADVENTURELAND PARK: $30k → 10%IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION: $30k → 10%IOWA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $24k → 10%IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
SD
IA
PA
CO
NE
MO
AZ
HI
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.5M · 21 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$7.5M
$69k

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Community ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +8%
  • PB
    PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $515k · revenue +81%
  • NY
    NEW YORK BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $508k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2019 · $39k
  • AP
    ADVENTURELAND PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Beef Cattle Association Inc

The indiana beef cattle association will build a better beef industry and stronger communities by forging partnerships to enhance profitability, protect the environment and increase consumer demand for a safe and healthy beef product.

2
Agribusiness Association of Iowa

The agribusiness association of iowa exists to advocate communicate and educate on behalf of a professional agribusiness industry.

3
Iowa Corn Promotion Board

The iowa corn promotion board (icpb) works to develop and defend markets, fund research, and provide education about corn and corn products. icpb's mission is to create opportunities for long term iowa corn grower profitability.

4
American Farm Bureau Federation

The american farm bureau federation is the voice of agriculture (r). we are farm and ranch families working together to build a sustainable future of safe and abundant food, fiber and renewable fuel for our nation and the world.

5
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
6
Illinois Pork Producers Association

To improve the quality, production efficiency, and promotion of pork. representation and advocacy in regulatory and policy issues affecting the pork industry.

7
South Dakota Beef Industry Council Inc

To collect and administer the $1 beef checkoff program for the state of south dakota. the beef checkoff program is used to promote, educate and provide research for the benefits of beef.

8
International Brangus Breeders Assoc

The ibba empowers members to advance the quality, reliability and value of brangus and brangus-influenced cattle; provides innovative programs and services which enhance the economic well-being of members and commercial customers.

9
Idaho Cattle Association Inc

To coordinate and advance the economic well being of the Idaho Beef Industry through innovative and effective political,educational, and marketing programs accepted and supported by all industry segments, partners, and coalitions.

Community Improvement
10
Iowa Corn Grower's Association

The iowa corn growers association (icga) is a membership organization lobbying to protect the rights of its more than 7,000 corn farmer members. icga serves as the collective voice for iowa corn farmers, lobbying on agricultural issues at…

11
Idaho Farm Bureau Federation Inc

To promote, improve and stabilze the agricultural industry in which its member are engaged, by securing greater efficiency in the production, distribution and marketing of agricultural products and to correlate and strengthen the county…

12
United States of America National Comm of the Int'l Dairy Fed Inc

The mission of the united states national committee of the international dairy federation is to represent the us dairy sector worldwide by providing the best global source of scientific expertise and knowledge in support of the development…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Cattlemen's Beef Association and the most unlike its peers is World Food Prize Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC — $1,405,200 · OtherUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INCPENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL — $515,074 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCILNEW YORK BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC — $507,708 · OtherNEW YORK BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL INCIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY — $483,009 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYFLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL INC — $270,000 · OtherFLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL INCARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL — $234,876 · OtherARIZONA BEEF COUNCILLEARFIELD COMMUNICATIONS — $147,300 · Other+13 more — $720,343 · Other+13 moreNATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION — $2,687,196 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION+1 more — $63,000 · Community ImprovementIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $350,000 · EducationIOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATION — $88,500 · Food & NutritionWorld Food Prize Foundation — $75,000 · PhilanthropyIowa Farm Animal Care Coalition — $60,000 · Animals
Other$4,283,510Community Improvement$2,750,196Education$350,000Food & Nutrition$88,500Philanthropy$75,000Animals$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION — $2,687,196 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC — $1,405,200 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL — $515,074 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetNEW YORK BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC — $507,708 over 7y, 16% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL INC — $270,000 over 6y, 34% of budgetARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL — $234,876 over 7y, 17% of budgetHAWAII CATTLEMENS COUNCIL — $130,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetIOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATION — $88,500 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetWorld Food Prize Foundation — $75,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCoalition to Support Iowa's Farmers — $63,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetIowa Farm Animal Care Coalition — $60,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetIOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS BEEF ASSOCIATION INC — $56,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetIOWA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION — $9,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds UNITED STATES MEAT EXPORT FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA BEEF COUNCIL
  • Who funds NEW YORK BEEF INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FLORIDA BEEF COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds ARIZONA BEEF COUNCIL
  • Who funds HAWAII CATTLEMENS COUNCIL
  • Who funds IOWA AGRICULTURE LITERACY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds World Food Prize Foundation
  • Who funds Coalition to Support Iowa's Farmers
  • Who funds Iowa Farm Animal Care Coalition
  • Who funds IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds ILLINOIS BEEF ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds IOWA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iowa Pork Producers AssociationIA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iowa Pork Producers Association · Iowa Corn Grower's Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Iowa Beef Cattle Producers Association Dba Iowa Beef Industry Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.2M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph