Skip to content
Interra Cares Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Interra Cares Foundation Inc

Living the credit union philosophy of people helping people.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$130kCommunity Improvement$75kHousing & Shelter$53kHuman Services$47kEducation$38kPhilanthropy$35kEmployment$20kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $111,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $116,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $97k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$276k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAPLE CITY HEALTHCARE$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$19,000
GOSHEN HEALTH SYSTEM$15,000
GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$12,500
DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES OF GOSHEN INC$10,000
CULTIVATE FOOD RESCUE$10,000
MILFORD FOOD BANK INC$10,000
ADEC INC$7,500
LACASA$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES OF GOSHEN INC: $10k → 13%GREENCROFT: $33k → 13%ADEC INC: $8k → 13%GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$388k · 8 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$388k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+11%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Community Impact Fund
    2× · 2022–2023 · $75k · revenue +59%
  • GH
    Goshen Health System Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +14%
  • CC
    CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • GG
    GREENCROFT GOSHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $33k · revenue +6%
  • HH
    Hubbard Hill Estates Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • CU
    CROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goshen Hospital & Health Care Foundation
Health
2
Echo Community Health Care Inc

We provide quality healthcare to all members of our community, including the uninsured, underinsured and homeless. Our comprehensive services are Affordable, Accessible and Appropriate. Our team of professionals is here to care for you and…

—
3
Cedar Falls Lutheran Home

Christian caring - enhancing lives through a commitment to individualized care in a home empowered by god's love.

Housing & Shelter
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Goshen Hospital Association Inc

The mission of Goshen Hospital is to improve the health of our communities by providing innovative, outstanding care and service, through exceptional people doing exceptional work.

Health
6
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
7
Chamber of Commerce Goshen Inc

To champion the community's business future.

—
8
Goshen Help

Improve the quality of life for people in need by empowering them to become more self sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
9
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
10
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
11
Community Howard Regional Health Foundation Inc

To improve the quality and availability of healthcare provided to all persons served by community howard regional health.

Health
12
Community Clinic Inc

Empower patients to partner with staff for an unparalleled healthcare experience through integrated primary care services teams in a learning environment. we deliver high quality, affordable care to every patient during all stages of life.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Community Impact Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPE: $75,000 · OtherCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COU: $65,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COUMAPLE CITY HEALTHCARE: $30,000 · OtherMAPLE CITY HEALTHCARECROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $20,000 · OtherCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INCThe Community Impact Fund: $75,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community Impact Fu…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $35,155 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF…GREENCROFT GOSHEN INC: $33,332 · Human ServicesGREENCROFT GOSH…GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGOSHEN COMMUNIT…DOWNTOWN MINISTRIES OF GOSHEN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN MINIST…ADEC INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesADEC INCGoshen Health System Inc: $60,000 · HealthGoshen Healt…LACASA OF GOSHEN INC: $28,000 · Housing & ShelterLACASA OF G…Hubbard Hill Estates Inc: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHubbard Hil…CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $30,000 · EmploymentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMILFORD FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$190,000Philanthropy$110,155Human Services$75,832Health$60,000Housing & Shelter$53,000Employment$30,000Youth Development$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Community Impact Fund: $75,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALING AND HOPE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COU: $65,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGoshen Health System Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $35,155 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENCROFT GOSHEN INC: $33,332 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLACASA OF GOSHEN INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetHubbard Hill Estates Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN MINISTRIES OF GOSHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetADEC INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

1st Source Bank Found…Community Foundation …Rex and Alice A Marti…Crossroads United Way…Winnebago Industries …Everence Association …Lake City Bank Founda…Welter Foundation IncAmerican Electric Pow…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Renaissance Charitabl…
1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-XxxxIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Rex and Alice A Martin Foundation Inc · Crossroads United Way Inc · Winnebago Industries Foundation · Everence Association Inc · Lake City Bank Foundation Inc · Welter Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Interra Cares Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Interra Cares Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Interra Cares Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Interra Cares Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Interra Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home