Skip to content
International Leadership Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

International Leadership Foundation

The ilf promotes the civic awareness, involvement & effectiveness of asian pacific americans (apa).

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$172kYouth Development$27kHealth$20kEducation$7kArts & Culture$5kCivil Rights$3kPublic Benefit$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $19,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $194,834 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $175,034 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES$9,000
BOWERS MUSEUM$5,000
TAIWANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE$3,000
YUMI CARES FOUNDATION$2,500
PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF TROOP 228$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BENEFIT TOMORROW: $25k → 8%BOWERS MUSEUM: $5k → 10%PARENTS ASSOCIATION OF TROOP 228: $300 → 14%CONGRESSIONAL AWARD FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%HSU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%YOUTH CREATES LLC: $1k → 8%YUMI CARES FOUNDATION: $17k → 6%APAPA-GDC: $6k → 8%COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES: $48k → 14%YUMI CARES FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%APAPA-GDC: $1k → 8%COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES: $45k → 14%TAIWANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $3k → 8%COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES: $30k → 14%COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES: $20k → 14%COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES: $20k → 14%COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINES: $9k → 14%APIA VOTE: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 3 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$198k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-68%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $172k · revenue -77% · 100% of their budget
  • YC
    YUMI CARES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue -68%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k

Funded once

  • BT
    BENEFIT TOMORROW
    5× · 2019–2023 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • HF
    HSU FAMILY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +34%
  • CA
    Congressional Award Foundationgraduated
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
2
Taiwanese-American Foundation
—
3
Association of Asian American Investment Managers

Founded in the Year 2006, the Association of Asian American Investment Managers AAAIM is a national trade association dedicated to the advance of AAPIs Asian Americans & Pacific-Islanders in the asset management industry. AAAIM supports…

Community Improvement
4
Tao of Tomorrow

Nonprofit empowering leadership, culture

Public Benefit
5
United Asian American Alliance Inc

For the betterment of communities.

Public Benefit
6
Asian American Academy of Science and Engineering Inc

Advance leadership and excellence of science and technology of the United States and to advocate for voices and rights of Asian Americans.To enhance professional communication and foster scientific discoveries and technological…

Science & Tech
7
East Coast Asian American Student Union Inc

The East Coast Asian American Student Union's mission is to inspire, educate, and empower those interested in Asian, Asian American, Pacific Islander, and Pacific Islander American (API/A) issues. Run solely by volunteers, ECAASU's…

Civil Rights
8
Center for Asian Americans United for Self-Empowerment Inc

Center for Asian Americans United for Self Empowerment CAUSE is a 501c3 nonprofit, nonpartisan, community-based organization with a mission to advance the political and civic empowerment of the Asian Pacific American APA community through…

Civil Rights
9
National Association of Asian American Professionals Boston Inc

NAAAP Boston is a non-profit, 501(c)(3), all-volunteer, Pan-Asian American professional organization that promotes the career advancement andleadership development of Asian American professionals in all fields through networking, Asian…

Environment
10
Asian American Art & Culture Initiative

Asian American Art & Culture Initiative is an organization promotes Asian art, culture and history through various programs, such as exhibition, contemporary art work and history/art workshops.

Arts & Culture
11
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc

The mission of asian americans advancing justice-aajc (aajc) is to advance civil and human rights for asian americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all.

Civil Rights
12
The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congressional Award Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Coalition of Asian American Business Organizations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS: $172,000 · Community ImprovementCOALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONSBENEFIT TOMORROW: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBENEFIT TOMORROWYUMI CARES FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · Arts & CultureYUMI CARES FOUNDATION I…CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM…Individual grant recipient: $6,700 · OtherTAIWANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $3,000 · OtherYOUTH CREATES LLC: $1,000 · Other+1 more: $300 · OtherHSU FAMILY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,042 · EducationCongressional Award Foundation: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote: $200 · Civil Rights
Community Improvement$172,000Arts & Culture$49,500Other$11,000Education$7,042Youth Development$1,000Civil Rights$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOALITION OF ASIAN AMERICAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS: $172,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetBENEFIT TOMORROW: $25,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetYUMI CARES FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetHSU FAMILY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,042 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTAIWANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCongressional Award Foundation: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Leadership Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Leadership Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to International Leadership Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to International Leadership Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Leadership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home