Skip to content
International Facility Management Assoc Group Return Gen 7100 at a glance

· Public charity

International Facility Management Assoc Group Return Gen 7100

To advance the facility management profession by guiding and developing facility management professionals through services, products, resources and opportunities.

$357k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Employment$194kEducation$44kHuman Services$38kAnimals$31kHealth$25kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $50,568, the rows itemized in this filing. The $356,755 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $306,187 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$11,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IFMA Foundation$19,068
FM Pipeline Team Inc$11,000
US Vets - Houston$11,000
Youth Action Programs and Homes Inc$9,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family Support of Line Delaware County: $12k → 10%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $5k → 7%US Vets - Houston: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
PA
CO
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 3 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$243k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+23%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IFMA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $194k · revenue -1%
  • FP
    FM PIPELINE TEAM INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $37k
  • HH
    HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue +12%
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT LINE OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -37%
  • TK
    TODD K DELANEY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue -78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
2
The House of Hope Inc

House of hope's mission is to provide the tools to achieve recovery from addiction and address mental health issues while transforming lives, families and communities. house of hope provides hope for the future and healing to those in need…

Health
3
Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc

Our mission is a seamless, accessible, recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care driven by consumers, providers, and other stakeholders, in which innovation and collaboration are the norm and diversified financial resources…

Health
4
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
5
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
6
Veterans & Community Housing Coalition

To provide housing opportunities for low income households, to serve the needs of homeless military veterans through case management, advocacy, employment opportunities, temporary and permanent housing to advocate for all military veterans.

Housing & Shelter
7
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
8
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
9
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
10
Child & Family Services of Eastern Va Inc D/B/a the Up Center

The up center has provided a safety net for the hampton roads community for 142 years. presently, we impact approximately 10,000 people each year. our mission is to partner with children, families, and communities to improve lives and…

Human Services
11
Safe Harbor

Safe harbor provides the support that survivors of sexual and domestic violence and human trafficking need to overcome their crisis and to transform their lives.

Human Services
12
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope House of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Todd K Delaney Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IFMA FOUNDATION: $194,175 · OtherIFMA FOUNDATIONFM PIPELINE TEAM INC: $36,631 · OtherFM PIPELINE TEAM INCYOUTH ACTION PROGRAMS AND HOMES INC: $9,500 · Other+3 more: $15,000 · Other+3 moreK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $31,073 · AnimalsK9S FOR WA…FAMILY SUPPORT LINE OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SU…UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $11,000 · Human ServicesUNITED ST…HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUS…HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE: $11,750 · HealthTODD K DELANEY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $8,500 · HealthGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Education
Other$255,306Animals$31,073Human Services$28,000Health$20,250Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIFMA FOUNDATION: $194,175 over 5y, 12% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $31,073 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT LINE OF DELAWARE COUNTY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE: $11,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ACTION PROGRAMS AND HOMES INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTODD K DELANEY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJULIE VALENTINE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Facility Management Assoc Group Return Gen 7100 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Facility Management Assoc Group Return Gen 7100. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Facility Management Assoc Group Return Gen 7100’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home