Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$52kEmployment$51kEducation$40kHuman Services$34k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $35,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $136,344 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $101,344 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teamsters Scholarship Fund$10,000
Joint Council 42 Charity Fund$10,000
LAANE$8,000
Labor Community Services$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Labor Community Services: $7k → 14%Labor Community Service: $6k → 14%Program for Torture Victims: $11k → 14%JFCS: $6k → 14%Program for Torture Victims: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$161k · 6 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$161k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc
    4× · 2018–2024 · $52k · revenue +13%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +19%
  • PF
    Program for Torture Victims
    2× · 2018–2019 · $21k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IB
    International Brotherhood of 988 TCWHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
2
Laborers International Union Local 4

Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits

—
3
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
4
International Brotherhood of 856 Tcwh Freight Checkers Clerical

Labor Union

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
7
Transport Workers Union of America

None

—
8
Laborers International Union of North America Local Union 44

Provide benefits of union membership

—
9
International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

—
10
International Brotherhood of Electrical Worker Local No 354

Labor organization

—
11
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

To provide for the organization of bargaining units; Negotiation of Collective Bargaining Agreements between bargaining units and employers; and the arbitration of any grievances under their agreements.

—
12
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 640

Labor Organizing

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Brotherhood of Teamsters Scholarship Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Program for Torture Victims. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $52,000 · PhilanthropyThe Southern California & Souther…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SC…INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD…Program for Torture Victims: $20,500 · Human ServicesProgram for Torture Victi…LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES: $13,000 · Human ServicesLABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES …JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY: $6,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRE…LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $35,023 · HealthLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE F…International Brotherhood of 988 TCWH: $10,000 · Other
Philanthropy$52,000Education$40,000Human Services$39,500Health$35,023Other$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $52,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $35,023 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES: $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 988 TCWH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Local 1932Teamsters Local 986 C…
International Brotherhood of 063 TCWHCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 848 Tcwh · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · Teamsters Local 1932 · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home