Skip to content
International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

$27M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$37MScience & Tech$15MEducation$1.9MInternational$1.8MEnvironment$521k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $6,170,405, the rows itemized in this filing. The $27,190,529 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,020,124 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $82k
  • $250k+6 grants · $6.1M
$673,716
Median grant
7
States reached
$141M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE - OSP$2,460,785
FHI CLINICAL INC$1,216,365
THE MITCHELL GROUP INC (TMG)$922,886
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$673,716
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$413,903
LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY$400,557
EMORY UNIVERSITY$43,165
SUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL$39,028
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1.5M → 16%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3.1M → 11%LSB RESEARCH GROUP LLC: $402k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH GALVESTON: $1.6M → 14%TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2.4M → 16%THE MITCHELL GROUP INC (TMG): $923k → 14%RESILIENCE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC: $521k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $482k → 10%FHI CLINICAL INC: $1.4M → 11%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $850k → 13%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 4%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $427k → 23%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $937k → 16%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE - OSP: $3.1M → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH GALVESTON: $695k → 14%TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1.7M → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $428k → 10%FHI CLINICAL INC: $1.2M → 11%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $772k → 13%INSTITUTE FOR PROTEIN INNOVATION INC: $894k → 16%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2.8M → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH GALVESTON: $453k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $716k → 13%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEACH CENTER: $707k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $433k → 16%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE - OSP: $2.7M → 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER SA: $468k → 16%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $682k → 13%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $674k → 9%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $414k → 16%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2.6M → 11%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $582k → 13%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEACH CENTER: $425k → 9%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE - OSP: $2.5M → 11%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $546k → 13%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $521k → 9%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1.8M → 11%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $462k → 13%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEACH CENTER: $381k → 9%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1.7M → 11%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $352k → 13%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $404k → 9%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1.3M → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $480k → 16%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY: $593k → 11%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $367k → 9%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY: $401k → 11%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $310k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $21M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $21M to organizations and $231k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$17M · 81% · 22 grants · 3 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT · RESEARCH CONSULTING

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$3.7M · 17% · 6 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT · VACCINE ADVOCACY, PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND POLICY · RESEARCH CONSULTING

Middle East and North Africa$262k · 1% · 1 grant · 1 person

Stated purpose: RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT · RESEARCH CONSULTING

South Asia$16k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59M · 30 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$59M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+16%

Still filing today

47%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +88%
  • EU
    Emory University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +80%
  • TB
    TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR PROTEIN INNOVATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $894k · revenue -14%
  • RG
    RESILIENCE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $521k
  • 1G
    10X GENOMICS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $244k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Iit Research Institute

Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…

Science & Tech
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Biomedical Research Institute; the most unlike its peers is Ballad Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $21,607,963 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTETEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,114,480 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTEINSTITUTE FOR PROTEIN INNOVATION INC: $894,057 · Health+2 more: $172,126 · HealthSEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3,480,171 · OtherSEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTETRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,404,953 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMB: $3,133,920 · OtherJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMBFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,881,499 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $1,787,651 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $1,121,396 · OtherTHE MITCHELL GROUP INC (TMG): $1,091,152 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1,088,641 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,023,865 · Other+21 more: $4,848,181 · Other+21 moreEmory University: $5,004,977 · EducationEmory Universi…The George Washington University: $1,881,680 · EducationThe George Was…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $618,943 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRA…+4 more: $488,805 · Education+4 moreFamily Health International Inc: $2,720,553 · InternationalTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $258,966 · International+1 more: $83,068 · InternationalNorthwestern University: $1,094,780 · Recreation & SportsBALLAD RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $128,292 · Science & Tech
Health$26,788,626Other$22,861,429Education$7,994,405International$3,062,587Recreation & Sports$1,094,780Science & Tech$128,292

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $21,607,963 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetEmory University: $5,004,977 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,114,480 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $3,480,171 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,404,953 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $2,720,553 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe George Washington University: $1,881,680 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,881,499 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $1,787,651 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,094,780 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PROTEIN INNOVATION INC: $894,057 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $618,943 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $258,966 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $240,857 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLIED BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: $157,018 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $140,553 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLAD RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $128,292 over 2y, 67% of budgetPATH: $83,068 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $55,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $51,745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $15,108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PROTEIN INNOVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds APPLIED BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds BALLAD RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emory UniversityVanderbilt University…Gates FoundationJohns Hopkins Univers…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Emory UniversityGA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emory University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Gates Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International AIDS Vaccine Initiative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home