Skip to content
Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association

A trade association formed to promote and protect the interests of the membership and the industry and to enhance public awareness of its contribution.

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$145kEducation$97kArts & Culture$58kHealth$31kCommunity Improvement$15kAnimals$11kRecreation & Sports$7kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $67,517, the rows itemized in this filing. The $112,239 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,722 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
$13,717
Median grant
1
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UAF FOUNDATION$47,800
BCDC$13,717
YUKON QUEST$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%UNITED WAY OF THE TANANA VALLEY: $6k → 8%MAT-SU INLET CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%ARCTIC WINTER GAMES CORPORATION OF ALASKA: $7k → 10%BCDC: $14k → 21%ALASKA CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $33k → 22%NORTH POLE FRIENDS OF THE NRA - THE NRA FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%UAF FOUNDATION: $49k → 8%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA AND WASHINGTON: $6k → 10%YUKON QUEST: $6k → 21%ALASKA CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $32k → 22%UAF FOUNDATION: $48k → 8%ALASKA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION FUND: $5k → 10%BCDC: $6k → 21%ALASKA CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $24k → 22%NORTH STAR DANCE FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%FAIRBANKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $5k → 21%ALASKA CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $23k → 22%NORTH STAR DANCE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ALASKA CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $22k → 22%NORTH STAR DANCE FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%ALASKA CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILER'S ASSOCIATION: $11k → 22%NORTH STAR DANCE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%NORTH STAR DANCE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$313k · 4 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$313k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+53%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHealthCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALASKA CABARETHOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $145k · revenue +21%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $97k
  • NS
    North Star Dance Foundation North Star Ballet
    5× · 2017–2021 · $53k · revenue -16%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAT-SU CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT AND RETAILERS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +183%
  • AW
    ARCTIC WINTER GAMES TEAM ALASKAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +150%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
2
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
3
Alaska Hospitality Retailers

To give a better understanding of related business in an industry through an association. To promote goodwill between the private sector and the public sector in the industry through charitable events.

Community Improvement
4
Anchorage Ski Club Inc

To provide access, facilities, recreation, and educational opportunities within the alpine environment of Chugach State Park.

Recreation & Sports
5
Alaska Farmers Market Association

to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture

Education
6
The Aleut Foundation
Education
7
Alaska Farmland Trust Corporation

The Alaska Farmland Trust envisions a future with thriving local food markets that will give Alaskans access to fresh, healthy food, and keep our farmers farming.

Environment
8
Anchorage Board of Realtors Inc

Promote, educate, and support the Anchorage real estate industry.

—
9
Alaska Association of Nurse Anesthesiology

To promote professional interest of membership

Community Improvement
10
Fairbank Rod and Gun Club

The betterment of its members through hunting, fishing, shooting activities while preserving wildlife habitat

—
11
Alaska Trails

Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.

Recreation & Sports
12
Alaska Mountain & Wilderness Huts Association dba Alaska Huts Association

To build and maintain lodgings that promote camaraderie, stewardship, outdoor education and Alaska's cultural heritage.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alaska & Washington; the most unlike its peers is Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALASKA CABARETHOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION: $144,550 · OtherALASKA CABARETHOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA: $97,103 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALASKABreast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp: $19,217 · OtherBreast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp+3 more: $17,000 · Other+3 moreNorth Star Dance Foundation North Star Ballet: $52,500 · Arts & CultureNorth Star Dance …Fairbanks Childrens Museum: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFairbanks Childre…MAT-SU CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT AND RETAILERS ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementARCTIC WINTER GAMES TEAM ALASKA: $7,380 · Recreation & SportsMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON: $6,390 · HealthNRA FOUNDATION INC: $6,105 · Crime & LegalAlaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc: $5,110 · Animals
Other$277,870Arts & Culture$57,500Community Improvement$15,000Recreation & Sports$7,380Health$6,390Crime & Legal$6,105Animals$5,110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALASKA CABARETHOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION: $144,550 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetNorth Star Dance Foundation North Star Ballet: $52,500 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetBreast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp: $19,217 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARCTIC WINTER GAMES TEAM ALASKA: $7,380 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON: $6,390 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNRA FOUNDATION INC: $6,105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYUKON QUEST INTERNATIONAL LTD: $6,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUnited Way of the Tanana Valley Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAlaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc: $5,110 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE RETAILERS ASSOC JUNEAU CHARR: $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFairbanks Childrens Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationThe Usibelli Foundati…The Alaska Community …Amazonsmile Foundation
Rasmuson FoundationAK19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Usibelli Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association?

    Find your warmest path to Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home