· Public charity
Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association
A trade association formed to promote and protect the interests of the membership and the industry and to enhance public awareness of its contribution.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of INTERIOR CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $67,517 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $112,239 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,722 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UAF FOUNDATION | $47,800 |
| BCDC | $13,717 |
| YUKON QUEST | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACALASKA CABARETHOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION6× · 2017–2022 · $145k · revenue +21%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA2× · 2023–2024 · $97k
- NSNorth Star Dance Foundation North Star Ballet5× · 2017–2021 · $53k · revenue -16%
Funded once
- MCMAT-SU CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT AND RETAILERS ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +183%
- AWARCTIC WINTER GAMES TEAM ALASKAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +150%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To give a better understanding of related business in an industry through an association. To promote goodwill between the private sector and the public sector in the industry through charitable events.
To provide access, facilities, recreation, and educational opportunities within the alpine environment of Chugach State Park.
to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture
The Alaska Farmland Trust envisions a future with thriving local food markets that will give Alaskans access to fresh, healthy food, and keep our farmers farming.
Promote, educate, and support the Anchorage real estate industry.
To promote professional interest of membership
The betterment of its members through hunting, fishing, shooting activities while preserving wildlife habitat
Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.
To build and maintain lodgings that promote camaraderie, stewardship, outdoor education and Alaska's cultural heritage.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Alaska & Washington and the most unlike its peers is Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALASKA CABARETHOTEL RESTAURANT & RETAILERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds North Star Dance Foundation North Star Ballet ↗
- Who funds Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp ↗
- Who funds MAT-SU CABARET HOTEL RESTAURANT AND RETAILERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ARCTIC WINTER GAMES TEAM ALASKA ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds NRA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YUKON QUEST INTERNATIONAL LTD ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Tanana Valley Inc ↗
- Who funds Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE RETAILERS ASSOC JUNEAU CHARR ↗
- Who funds Fairbanks Childrens Museum ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Usibelli Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association?
Find your warmest path to Interior Cabaret Hotel Restaurant & Retailers Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.