Skip to content

· Public charity

Integrated Community Planning of Oswego County Inc

To promote collaboration among oswego county community members, health and human services agencies, businesses, faith groups, youth, and families as a means for improving quality of life, and ensuring community and agency financial viability and stability.

$90k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Human Services$132k
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $67,956, the rows itemized in this filing. The $89,580 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,624 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$7,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC$18,126
KIDS COUNT CHILDCARE$14,020
LITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - OSWEGO$10,136
ITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARE$7,800
PLAYTIME PALS AFFORDABLE DAYCARE$6,160
LITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - FULTON$5,974
DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER OSWEGO COUNTY$5,740
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC: $18k → 17%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$78k · 4 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$78k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+146%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $24k · revenue +102%
  • KC
    KIDS COUNT CHILDCARE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $21k
  • IB
    ITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +146%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • LH
    LOVING HEARTS CHILD CARE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIDS COUNT CHILDCARE: $20,555 · OtherKIDS COUNT CHILDCAREITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARE: $19,660 · OtherITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARETHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INC: $17,763 · OtherTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INCPLAYTIME PALS AFFORDABLE DAYCARE: $14,230 · OtherPLAYTIME PALS AFFORDABLE DAYCARELITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - OSWEGO: $10,136 · OtherLITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - OSWEGOIndividual grant recipient: $9,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - FULTON: $5,974 · OtherLITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - FULTONDISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER OSWEGO COUNTY: $5,740 · OtherLOVING HEARTS CHILD CARE: $5,084 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC: $23,592 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S CENTE…
Other$108,892Human Services$23,592

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC: $23,592 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INC: $17,763 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Integrated Community Planning of Oswego County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Integrated Community Planning of Oswego County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Integrated Community Planning of Oswego County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph