Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Integrated Community Planning of Oswego County Inc

To promote collaboration among oswego county community members, health and human services agencies, businesses, faith groups, youth, and families as a means for improving quality of life, and ensuring community and agency financial viability and stability.

$90k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of INTEGRATED COMMUNITY PLANNING OF OSWEGO COUNTY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $67,956 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $89,580 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,624 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$7,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC$18,126
KIDS COUNT CHILDCARE$14,020
LITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - OSWEGO$10,136
ITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARE$7,800
PLAYTIME PALS AFFORDABLE DAYCARE$6,160
LITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - FULTON$5,974
DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER OSWEGO COUNTY$5,740
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC: $18k → 17%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$78k · 4 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$78k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+146%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $24k · revenue +102%
  • KC
    KIDS COUNT CHILDCARE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $21k
  • IB
    ITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +146%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • LH
    LOVING HEARTS CHILD CARE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIDS COUNT CHILDCARE — $20,555 · OtherKIDS COUNT CHILDCAREITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARE — $19,660 · OtherITTY BITTY ANGELS FAMILY DAYCARETHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INC — $17,763 · OtherTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INCPLAYTIME PALS AFFORDABLE DAYCARE — $14,230 · OtherPLAYTIME PALS AFFORDABLE DAYCARELITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - OSWEGO — $10,136 · OtherLITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - OSWEGOIndividual grant recipient — $9,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - FULTON — $5,974 · OtherLITTLE LUKES PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE CENTER - FULTONDISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER OSWEGO COUNTY — $5,740 · OtherLOVING HEARTS CHILD CARE — $5,084 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC — $23,592 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S CENTE…
Other$108,892Human Services$23,592

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC — $23,592 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INC — $17,763 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF OSWEGO INC
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FULTON NEW YORK INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Integrated Community Planning of Oswego County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph