How much did INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION reported 18 grants totaling $509,556 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION based?

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION is based in ND.

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION

To promote healthy and sustainable communities by providing financial gifts, strengthening collaborative relationships and supporting local initiatives that impact the mental, physical and spiritual well-being of residents in the counties of bottineau, burke, mchenry, mclean, mountrail, pierce, renville, rolette, sheridan, ward and wells.

$510k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$43k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

purchaseseatsmedicalscholarshipcamplivingcare

2020

buildinggroundsmaintenancekeepturtle lakemember boardclinic

2021

elderlychildyouthprogram'scarechildrenfood pantry

2022

garrisoneducationalcamplivingchurchprogram'sministries

2023

program'sagencys meals

2024

housingprogram'scarepersonsfood pantryagencys meals

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $65k
$10k–50k10 grants · $209k

$10,615

Median grant

States reached

$19M

Total assets

Largest grants

PROJECT BEE$43,150
OUR LADY OF GRACE FOOD PANTRY$37,905
THE LORD'S CUPBOARD - MINOT$23,054
MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY$20,448
MINOT COMMISSION ON AGING$20,000
SALVATION ARMY FOOD PANTRY$16,588
SOURIS BASIN TRANSPORTATION$15,000
THE VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER$12,000
ST ANN'S YOUTH MINISTRY$10,615
MINOT AREA HOMELESS COALITION$10,000
SOCIETY OF ST STEPHENS - FOOD PANTRY$9,440
YMCA TRIANGLE Y CAMP$9,350
METIGOSHE MINISTRIES$9,000
FIRST DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT$8,000
KENMARE WHEELS & MEALS$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $282k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 82% of INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in ND; read by stated purpose it is 19% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.0M · 32 repeat orgs$434k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.0M

$347k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+39%

Still filing today

63%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SJ
ST JOSEPH'S COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION
3× · 2020–2022 · $729k · revenue +124% · 49% of their budget
VF
VILLAGE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $153k · revenue +4%
Y
YWCA
4× · 2018–2024 · $111k · revenue +295%

Funded once

SC
STANLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
one grant, 2021 · $23k
RR
ROLETTE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT #2
one grant, 2021 · $21k
RC
ROLETTE COMMUNITY CARE CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Western South Dakota Senior Services

Serving meals to elderly in western south dakota

—

Southeastern North Dakota Community

Assistance to low-income individuals in a six county area of north dakota.

Human Services

Tri-County Health Center

Providing nursing care and congregate housing services to aged men and women.

—

Prairie Harvest Mental Health

We promote independence and an enhanced quality of life for adults with serious mental illness.

Human Services

Minnesota River Area Agency on Aging Inc

MNRAAA helps older adults thrive in Southwest MN by enabling older adults to maintain the lifestyle of their choice. MNRAAA strives to ensure that services are available for older adults and caregivers, by providing information and…

Human Services

Northwood Deaconess Health Center

Serve as a local access to a full range of health care services. continue as a leader in primary care for the whole family, in care of the elderly, and in emergency services. Function as a focal point for health education and wellness.

Health

Northland Health Care Access

Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri who are ineligible for other

Health

Western Resources for Independ

To advocate disabled individual

Human Services

North Dakota Long Term Care Association

We are a professional association of long term care and community service providers who enhance the lives of people we serve through collaboration, education and advocacy.

—

Northland Health Partners Community

Delivering patient centered, accessible, quality-driven, medical, dental, and behavioral healthcare, to all generations to strengthen the health status in the communities we serve, regardless of the ability to pay

Health

Care Partners

To assist individuals with cancer and life-limiting illnesses

Health

Northland Counseling Center Inc

Northland Counseling Center, Inc. is dedicated to providing a variety of services to people who may be experiencing mental health, chemical dependency, or co-occurring issues. By applying best practices in teaching life changing skills, it…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership - Minot and the most unlike its peers is Nexus-Path Family Healing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/75

the rest of the field

165/2,175

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/43

Grantees still filing

35/43

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,083,087Philanthropy$750,286Human Services$281,992Food & Nutrition$132,465Health$98,531Crime & Legal$32,108Recreation & Sports$31,370

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inspiritus Community Health FoundationND93.2× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inspiritus Community Health Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Minot Community Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Souris Valley United Way · Otto Bremer Trust · Minot Junior Golf Association Inc · Impact Foundation · Great Plains Food Bank · Minot Hockey Boosters Inc · United Way of Cass-Clay

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ST JOSEPH'S COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 450454700 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ST JOSEPH'S COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 49% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Inspiritus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Inspiritus Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Inspiritus Foundation?

More from the funding graph

INSPIRITUS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Inspiritus Foundation?

More from the funding graph