Skip to content
Insita Group Ltd at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Insita Group Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$3.0MCivil Rights$1.2MHealth$500kPublic Benefit$450kPhilanthropy$300kInternational$150kSocial Science$100kEducation$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $500k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$200,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORTH RISES$600,000
RECIDIVIZ$500,000
CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS$300,000
FINE & FEES JUSTICE CENTER$200,000
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION$200,000
ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER$100,000
JUSTICE CATALYST ACCESS FUND$40,000
PRISON POLICY INITIATIVE$25,000
PARTNERS FOR JUSTICE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER: $100k → 11%RECIDIVIZ: $500k → 10%Bard Prison Initiative: $50k → 9%Justice Lab: $100k → 17%TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $150k → 20%TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS: $300k → 14%PANORAMA GLOBAL: $100k → 9%MPN Research Foundation: $150k → 14%JUSTICE CATALYST ACCESS FUND: $40k → 8%GLOBAL IMPACT - ONE FOR JUSTICE: $50k → 9%SISTER HEARTS: $10k → 22%VOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED: $50k → 23%Brigham Women's Hospital: $50k → 16%ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER: $100k → 11%RECIDIVIZ: $300k → 10%JUSTICE LAB: $50k → 17%Katal Center for Justice: $25k → 20%CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS: $300k → 14%MPN Research Foundation: $100k → 14%NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR INCARCERATED AND FORMERLY INCARCERATED WOMEN: $100k → 16%RECIDIVIZ: $300k → 10%PARTNERS FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 17%VERA INSTITUTE: $100k → 20%CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS: $300k → 14%Dr Ann Mullally MPN: $50k → 14%WORTH RISES: $600k → 17%Katal Center for Justice: $25k → 20%Civil Rights Corps: $200k → 14%WORTH RISES: $300k → 17%CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS: $100k → 14%WORTH RISES: $100k → 17%NEW VENTURE FUND: $200k → 14%WORTH RISES: $100k → 17%NEW VENTURE FUND: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 9 repeat orgs$900k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$4.8M
$810k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+50%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsCrime & LegalHealthEducationPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $350k · revenue +10%
  • TM
    THE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $250k · revenue +26%
  • AL
    ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • VR
    VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +43%
  • PG
    PANORAMA GLOBALgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Promise of Justice Initiative

The promise of justice initiative works to create positive change for people in the criminal legal system at the intersection of impact litigation, direct services and community engagement.

Crime & Legal
2
Prison Law Office

The mission of the prison law office is to reduce incarceration and ensure humane and constitutional treatment of people who remain in prisons, jails and on parole.

Crime & Legal
3
The Marshall Project Inc

The marshall project is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization covering criminal justice.

Community Improvement
4
Center for Effective Public Policy Inc

Cepp works collaboratively to improve systems of justice and advance community well-being by sharing expertise, promoting research-informed and emerging practices, and facilitating change.

—
5
Justice Policy Institute

The Justice Policy Institute is dedicated to reducing the use of incarceration and involvement in the justice system by promoting fair and effective policies.

Crime & Legal
6
Fines and Fees Justice Center Inc

The fines and fees justice center, inc. ("ffjc") is the only national organization focused exclusively on the unjust and harmful fines and fees imposed in the legal system. through education and advocacy, ffjc works to create a justice…

Crime & Legal
7
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
8
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
9
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
10
Accountable Justice Action Fund

The association supports and promotes criminal justice reform via public education, advocacy, donor advising and grant making. our core programmatic areas are grants and donor advising.

Crime & Legal
11
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
12
National Crime Victim Law Institute

To promote comprehensive and enforceable legal rights for crime victims, and access to knowledgeable attorneys to help protect those rights in every case through victim centered legal advocacy, education, and resources.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project; the most unlike its peers is Bard College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS: $1,200,000 · Civil RightsCIVIL RIGHTS CORPSWORTH RISES INC: $1,100,000 · Civil RightsWORTH RISES INC+2 more: $65,000 · Civil RightsRECIDIVIZ: $1,100,000 · OtherRECIDIVIZFINE & FEES JUSTICE CENTER: $350,000 · OtherFINE & FEES JUSTICE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $150,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $100,000 · OtherVERA INSTITUTE: $100,000 · Other+5 more: $210,000 · Other+5 moreABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER: $200,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR INCARCERATED AND FORMERLY INCARCERATED WOMEN & GIRLS: $100,000 · Crime & LegalVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE: $50,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $350,000 · Public BenefitNEW VENTURE FUND: $300,000 · EnvironmentTHE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthPANORAMA GLOBAL: $100,000 · InternationalBARD COLLEGE: $50,000 · Education
Civil Rights$2,365,000Other$2,160,000Crime & Legal$375,000Public Benefit$350,000Environment$300,000Health$250,000International$100,000Education$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIVIL RIGHTS CORPS: $1,200,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetWORTH RISES INC: $1,100,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER: $200,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR INCARCERATED AND FORMERLY INCARCERATED WOMEN & GIRLS: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE CATALYST ACCESS FUND INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPrison Policy Initiative: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERS FOR JUSTICE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Amalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundThe Ford FoundationThe Just Trust for Ed…Public Welfare Founda…Rockefeller Philanthr…The Robert Wood Johns…Boston Foundation IncNational Philanthropi…Tides Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · The Just Trust for Education · Public Welfare Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Insita Group Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Insita Group Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Insita Group Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to Insita Group Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Insita Group Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home