Skip to content

· Public charity

Inquiring Systems Inc

Implementing ethical social change through training, technical assistance, business and financial management, and fiscal sponsorship services to nonprofit organizations and socially responsible businesses.

$697k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Animals$255kScience & Tech$218kFood & Nutrition$206kEnvironment$176kCivil Rights$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kHealth$23kCommunity Improvement$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $419,651, the rows itemized in this filing. The $696,970 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $277,319 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $130k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$8,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACIFIC INTEGRAL LLC$150,000
RAINWALK REWILD$50,000
SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$27,589
TRUCULTURE LLC$13,000
GALLOWAY FAMILY FARM & EDUCATION CENTER$13,000
TIERRA NEGRA FARMS$12,800
CENTAURUS FOUNDATION$12,352
HIGH HOG FARM$10,500
VETS IN VANS$9,180
MYSTIC PINE FARM$8,400
VCA PETCARE EAST$8,308
MARSH VIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM$8,000
DEEP ROOTS COMMUNITY PLANNING SOLUTIONS$8,000
DREAM ROOM DESIGNS DBA ECO SUN FARMS$8,000
ILOGIC RED COLLECTIVE LLC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%NATIONAL SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE COALITION: $8k → 12%PENINSULA AVENUE VETERINARY CLINIC: $11k → 7%PACIFIC VETERINARY EMERGENCY & SPECIALTY HOSPITAL: $6k → 9%VCA ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY: $28k → 9%CENTER FOR THIRD WORLD ORGANIZING: $32k → 10%THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9k → 10%VCA BAY AREA VET SPECIALISTS: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $14k → 14%ASHKORA FARM: $8k → 14%MARSH VIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $8k → 10%SUBTLE ENERGY GROUP LLC: $68k → 15%ILOGIC RED COLLECTIVE LLC: $8k → 30%FELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY: $8k → 16%WILD PATH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $8k → 9%DEEP ROOTS COMMUNITY PLANNING SOLUTIONS: $8k → 10%TIERRA NEGRA FARMS: $13k → 11%PINE KNOT FARMS: $8k → 14%HEALING JOY MINISTRIES LLC: $8k → 15%FAIRPORT FARMS: $8k → 20%AFRO AGRICULTURE LLC: $8k → 8%HIGH HOG FARM: $11k → 9%PECAN MILK COOPERATIVE: $8k → 14%FAST FEAST FARM: $7k → 24%CENTAURUS FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%PACIFIC INTEGRAL LLC: $150k → 9%RAINWALK REWILD: $50k → 9%GALLOWAY FAMILY FARM & EDUCATION CENTER: $13k → 16%TRUCULTURE LLC: $13k → 22%MYSTIC PINE FARM: $8k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $23k → 20%SISTERS OF THE SOIL COMMUNITY FARM: $8k → 11%CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS: $8k → 12%LENITY VET SPECIALISTS: $6k → 7%VCA ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY: $8k → 9%VETS IN VANS INC: $20k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $29k → 10%TIERRA NEGRA FARMS: $12k → 11%DREAM ROOM DESIGNS DBA ECO SUN FARMS: $8k → 14%VCA OF SONOMA COUNTY INC: $7k → 9%VETS IN VANS: $9k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $28k → 10%FORESTREE COLLECTIVE LLC: $90k → 9%VCA BAY AREA VETERINARY SPECIALISTS & EMERGENCY HOSPITAL: $9k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $17k → 10%VCA PETCARE EAST: $8k → 9%MISSION PET HOSPITAL: $9k → 10%VCA ANIMAL HOSPITALS INC: $8k → 9%MISSION PET HOSPITAL INC: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
SD
OH
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
NM
NC
SC
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302k · 9 repeat orgs$664k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +152% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$302k
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+152%
+27%

Still filing today

22%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $333k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentInternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $73k
  • VA
    VCA ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $59k
  • SF
    SEJAH FARM OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
    2× · 2023–2025 · $49k

Funded once

  • FC
    FORESTREE COLLECTIVE LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • SE
    SUBTLE ENERGY GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $68k
  • Center for Third World Organizinggraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $32k · revenue ×17
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Village Agricultural Cooperative

Connect people with land, water, and culture. provide education and resource connections. grow the farmers and food producers of tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
2
Veterinary Sustainability Alliance

We provide education and resources for veterinary professionals to be more environmentally sustainable in their work.

Animals
3
Collaborative Cats Inc

We are a feline foster home based rescue organization providing rescue, rehoming, low-cost spay & neutur services, vaccinations, and farm colony management.

Animals
4
Center for the study of the Americas

Within the Americas promoting dialogue and research, producing studies and reports, conducting courses and conferences particularly in the areas of agroecology and food security

—
5
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
6
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
7
Black Seeds

prove asset to organic food

Food & Nutrition
8
One Village Project

One Village Project is a model of visionary education and regenerative living that unites a global community in service to the highest expressions of life one another and the earth. Grown out of 25+ years of global humanitarian projects…

Environment
9
The Manav Foundation
Education
10
Northwest Farms to Families

The NWF2F DBA Minority Growers Collective is a 501(c)3 charitable nonprofit founded in February of 2021 to meet the education, training, and financial assistance needs of agricultural growers and producers of color and meet the needs of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Village Earth

Village earth helps reconnect communities to the resources that promote human well-being by enhancing social and political empowerment, community self-reliance and self-determination. we do this by strengthening intermediate and grassroots…

International
12
Black Farmers Collective

Black Farmers Collective exists to improve the health of communities through urban gardens and farming.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Path Collective Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACIFIC INTEGRAL LLC: $150,000 · OtherPACIFIC INTEGRAL LLCFORESTREE COLLECTIVE LLC: $90,000 · OtherFORESTREE COLLECTIVE LLCSAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $73,415 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTERSUBTLE ENERGY GROUP LLC: $68,000 · OtherSUBTLE ENERGY GROUP LLCVCA ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTY: $58,571 · OtherVCA ANIMAL CARE CENTER OF SONOMA COUNTYRAINWALK REWILD: $50,000 · OtherRAINWALK REWILDSEJAH FARM OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS: $49,200 · OtherSEJAH FARM OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS+31 more: $332,751 · Other+31 moreVETS IN VANS INC: $28,782 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,680 · AnimalsCenter for Third World Organizing: $32,000 · InternationalST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $12,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY INC: $8,300 · Arts & CultureWILD PATH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $8,300 · EnvironmentMARSHVIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $8,000 · Youth Development
Other$871,937Animals$37,462International$32,000Philanthropy$12,000Arts & Culture$8,300Environment$8,300Youth Development$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVETS IN VANS INC: $28,782 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY INC: $8,300 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWILD PATH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $8,300 over 1y, 79% of budgetMARSHVIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM: $8,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Center for Third World Organizing ↗
  • Who funds VETS IN VANS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds ST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD PATH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MARSHVIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rural Advancement Foundation InternationNC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rural Advancement Foundation Internation · Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless · Resist Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Tides Center · Tides Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inquiring Systems Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inquiring Systems Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Inquiring Systems Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Inquiring Systems Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Inquiring Systems’ filings →

    More from the funding graph