Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Innovations for Poverty Action a Nonprofit Corporation

Innovations for poverty action discovers and promotes effective solutions to global poverty.

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 32 grants below total $1,833,777 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,482,661 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,648,884 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $406k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$25,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$360,457
THE FREEDOM FUND$207,542
YALE UNIVERSITY$174,485
UNIV OF PENN TRUSTE$127,091
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$115,673
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$110,972
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$104,138
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$95,056
THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY$60,000
BUSARA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS INC$51,429
THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$49,453
END MODERN SLAVERY INITIATIVE FOUND$41,316
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE$30,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$27,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS$26,013
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $630k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $295k → 10%ELEISON FOUNDATION: $35k → 9%MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC: $16k → 8%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $116k → 10%ELEISON FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $49k → 10%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $82k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $21k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $1.6M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$618k · 38% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: WOMEN AND GIRLS FIRST · RESEARCHER DIVERSIFICATION INITIATIVE- RWANDA · CAN RADIO REDUCE IPV?

South America$609k · 37% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: ECD TECH INTERVENTION · PREVENTING HOMICIDES BY IMPROVING HEALTH SERVICE DELIVERY IN COLOMBIA · GUARDIAN - SCHOOL DROP OUT GUATEMALA

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$299k · 18% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON THE IMPACT OF WORK PERMITS · IMPROVEMENTS OF SAFE AND EMPOWERING RESPONSES TO CHILD TRAFFICKING DISCLOSURES · UCL (GREECE)

South Asia$103k · 6% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: EVALUATION OF THE EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME · THE IMPACTS OF FAST RETAIL PAYMENTS ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND INNOVATION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$10k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: REFUGEE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND REGIONAL MARKETS IN A HUMANITARIAN SETTING

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 30% of Innovations for Poverty Action a Nonprofit Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 4% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Innovations for Poverty Action a Nonprofit Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 28 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
22

Total granted

$8.6M
$869k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+18%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $496k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $951k · revenue +81%
  • SF
    SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND
    6× · 2017–2023 · $512k · revenue +29%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $460k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $255k
  • I
    INTUIT
    one grant, 2017 · $130k
  • PD
    PRECISION DEVELOPMENT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $52k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Eleison Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%67%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/62
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,503

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
31/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $2,037,168 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $894,875 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $611,091 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO — $473,437 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGOEND MODERN SLAVERY INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $291,296 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT — $255,000 · Other+22 more — $1,350,571 · Other+22 moreYale University — $436,376 · EducationYale UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $356,482 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVE…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $341,692 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES…University of Chicago — $167,781 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $156,882 · EducationPresident and Fellows…New York University — $150,813 · EducationNew York UniversityTrustees of Tufts College — $124,970 · EducationTrustees of Tufts Col…Massachusetts Institute of Technology — $116,661 · EducationWilliam & Mary Foundation — $83,749 · Education+9 more — $303,235 · Education+9 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $950,833 · InternationalInternational Re…SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND — $511,642 · InternationalSEARCH FOR COMMO…+8 more — $231,073 · International+8 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL — $460,164 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT — $103,291 · Human ServicesELEISON FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human Services+2 more — $34,554 · Human ServicesTHE FREEDOM FUND — $425,559 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University — $368,006 · Recreation & SportsINTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $291,835 · Food & Nutrition
Other$5,913,438Education$2,238,641International$1,693,548Human Services$648,009Philanthropy$425,559Recreation & Sports$368,006Food & Nutrition$291,835

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $950,833 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND — $511,642 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL — $460,164 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetYale University — $436,376 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FREEDOM FUND — $425,559 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $368,006 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $356,482 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $341,692 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $291,835 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEND MODERN SLAVERY INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $291,296 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $167,781 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $156,882 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $150,813 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $149,815 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $144,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $124,970 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $116,661 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT — $103,291 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWilliam & Mary Foundation — $83,749 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $69,892 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRECISION DEVELOPMENT INC — $51,868 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBUSARA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS INC — $51,429 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEISON FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $42,753 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $39,822 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork for Empowerment & Progressive Initiatives - Nepi Inc — $38,298 over 3y, 26% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $38,014 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $34,364 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $26,599 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Freedom Story — $26,565 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetWorld Hope International Inc — $24,796 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWillow International Everfree — $18,417 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEmory University — $16,084 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $12,607 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $12,521 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD LEARNING INC — $12,217 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $10,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC — $4,459 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds THE FREEDOM FUND ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds END MODERN SLAVERY INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRECISION DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds BUSARA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ELEISON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Network for Empowerment & Progressive Initiatives - Nepi Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wellspring Philanthro…Gates FoundationThe Rockefeller Found…Johns Hopkins Univers…Silicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationFamily Health Interna…Humanity UnitedConrad N Hilton Found…The Nature ConservancyThe William & Flora H…New Venture Fund
Wellspring Philanthropic Fund IncNY19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Gates Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Family Health International Inc · Humanity United · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · New Venture Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Innovations for Poverty Action a Nonprofit Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Network for Empowerment & Progressive Initiatives - Nepi Inc — 48% of income from government
  • World Learning Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • International Youth Foundation — 17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines