Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Inman Riverdale Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$306kPhilanthropy$157kArts & Culture$152kEducation$93kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$52kReligion$13kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$600
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT$18,508
MOBILE MEAL SERVICE OF SPARTANBURG CO$6,000
J GREEN$2,235
P PALMER$1,402
R DOBBINS$1,100
SC SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND FOUNDATION$1,000
ADULT LEARNING CENTER$1,000
WOODRUFF ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB$1,000
PALMETTO COUNCIL BSA$1,000
ALDERSGATE METHODIST CHURCH$600
ENOREE METHODIST CHURCH$600
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ENOREE$600
BLIND INDUSTRIES & SERVICES OF MARYLAND$500
SPARTANBURG COUNTY FOUNDATION$300
NEW DAY CLUBHOUSE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$455k · 41 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
33

Total granted

$455k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+14%

Still filing today

12%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ADULT LEARNING CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • SF
    SCSDB FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • HS
    HEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • CC
    CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +7%
  • SC
    Spartanburg County Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

2
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
3
South Carolina Community Capital Alliance

Our mission is to facilitate the investment of capital in south carolina in order to improve the quality of life for all her citizens by providing responsible and affordable financial products and services that are a major catalyst for…

Community Improvement
4
South Carolina Council On Economic Education

Sc economics is the only sc non-profit organization exclusively dedicated to improving economic education and financial literacy by preparing teachers and students to be active, successful, and prosperous members of our global economy.

5
South Carolina Community Loan Fund

South carolina community loan fund (scclf) is a u.s. treasury certified community development financial institution (cdfi) whose mission is to advance equitable access to capital by providing loans, technical assistance, and advocacy for…

Housing & Shelter
6
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
7
Sc Educational Communications Inc

South Carolina Educational Communications, Inc. ("SCEC") supports and promotes educational public media activities in South Carolina and across the United States, including the development and creation of original content for broadcast and…

Arts & Culture
8
Spartanburg Day School

The mission of the spartanburg day school is to provide a superior educational experience, in a community of trust, that prepares students for a life well lived. spartanburg day school is dually accredited by southern association of…

9
South Carolina Humanities Council Inc

The mission of south carolina humanities council, inc. is to enrich the cultural and intellectual lives of south carolinians. the organization seeks to increase public understanding of and support for the humanities by telling the human…

Arts & Culture
10
South Carolina Christian Chamber of Commerce

To unify christians in south carolina by connecting commerce and community to positively impact our culture for christ.

Religion
11
South Carolina Independent Colleges and Universities

Scicu seeks to advance higher education in south carolina through fundraising, scholarships, research, as well as facilitating collaborative activities among the member institutions. scicu also enhances a positive public image and…

Education
12
South Carolina Association for Community Economic Development

Through our network of members and partner organizations, SCACED strives to improve the quality of life for low-wealth families and communities by advancing community economic development and public policy in South Carolina.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adult Learning Center and the most unlike its peers is Angel's Charge Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $92,540 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INCTHE ARTS PARTNERSHIP — $75,000 · OtherTHE ARTS PARTNERSHIPThe Arts Partnership — $50,000 · OtherThe Arts PartnershipYMCA — $50,000 · OtherYMCAUnited Way of the Piedmont — $35,682 · OtherUnited Way of the PiedmontMOBILE MEAL SERVICE OF SPARTANBURG CO — $34,000 · OtherMOBILE MEAL SERVICE OF SPARTANBURG COIndividual grant recipient — $29,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIPTAY — $28,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $20,894 · OtherMobile Meal Service of Spartanburg Co — $18,000 · Other+63 more — $99,829 · Other+63 moreCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureSpartanburg County Foundation — $12,600 · PhilanthropyYMCA OF GREENVILLE — $5,000 · Human ServicesADULT LEARNING CENTER — $4,000 · EducationPALMETTO COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC — $3,000 · Health
Other$533,645Arts & Culture$25,000Philanthropy$12,600Human Services$5,000Education$4,000Youth Development$4,000Health$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $92,540 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSpartanburg County Foundation — $12,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREENVILLE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT LEARNING CENTER — $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPALMETTO COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSCSDB FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetANGEL'S CHARGE MINISTRY — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInman Chamber of Commerce — $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHARLES LEA CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAITIAN HOPE INC — $175 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PIEDMONT INC
  • Who funds CHAPMAN CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Spartanburg County Foundation
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREENVILLE
  • Who funds ADULT LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds PALMETTO COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA
  • Who funds SCSDB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spartanburg County FoundationSC26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spartanburg County Foundation · Milliken & Company Charitable Foundation · J M Smith Foundation · Arkwright Foundation · Gibbs Charitable Foundation · Mary Black Foundation Inc · Wr & Eh Floyd Foundation · Harry H Gibson Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Anna M Black Charitable Foundation · Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Inman Riverdale Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Inman Riverdale Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Inman Riverdale Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph