Loading…
· Public charity
Inland Empire United
To serve as a progressive coalition that strengthens social justice and increases community engagement through issue education and public policy advocacy in the Inland Empire.
$422k
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
0160% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Employment$85kHousing & Shelter$69kEnvironment$54kReligion$46kPublic Benefit$42kEducation$33kOther$216k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
—
2023
outreach civic
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $182k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $238k
$47,481
Median grant
1
States reached
$697k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice$72,183
- STARTING OVER INC$62,323
- ALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY$51,695
- WAREHOUSE WORKER RESOURCE CENTER$51,670
- PEOPLE'S COLLECTIVE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE$47,481
- Congregations Organized for Prophetic Engagement$39,150
- SIGMA BETA XI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$34,902
- INLAND CONGREGATIONS UNITED FOR CHANGE$20,060
- COMMUNITIES FOR A NEW CALIFORNIA EDUCATION FUND$20,000
- INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 62% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$458k · 9 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
9
2
Total granted
$458k
$15k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+382%
+1589%
Still filing today
100%
50%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EmploymentEducationHousing & ShelterEnvironmentReligionPublic BenefitOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICINLAND CONGREGATIONS UNITED FOR CHANGE2× · 2023–2024 · $77k · revenue +264%
- SOSTARTING OVER INC2× · 2023–2024 · $69k · revenue +209%
- ACALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY2× · 2023–2024 · $58k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- CCCourage California Issues Committeeone grant, 2022 · $8k
- YMYOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +1589%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
California Employers Association
Provide all member employers with current human resource and California labor law information.
—
2
Inquilinos Unidos
Dedicated to empowering low-income tenants through community organizing, education and advocacy to fight for safe, decent and affordable housing in Los Angeles.
Unclassified
3
Central California Environmental
To empower our communities and secure our childrens future by eliminating negative enviromental impacts in low income and communities of color in the Central Valley.
Environment
4
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
Human Services
5
El Concilio California
Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.
Human Services
6
California Competes
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…
Education
7
Central Coast Alliance United for a
To build grassroots power to realize social, economic and environmental justice for the people of the Central Coast Region through policy research, leadership development, organizing and advocacy.
Community Improvement
8
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
—
9
California Environmental Voters
To increase public awareness of elected officials' performances on environmental issues, to influence decisions of public officials on environmental legislation and policy, and to engage in related social welfare activities to promote and…
Civil Rights
10
Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Collective
The Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Collective creates a safe space for immigrant youth to express themselves and achieve their full potential and their identity that intersects with being undocumented. Through grassroots organizing, our…
Human Services
11
Coalition for Responsible and Equitable
To ensure that the workers in the construction industry in Los Angeles are highly trained and professional. The organization seeks the creation of good jobs, safety for workers, health care and a secure retirement for working families.
Community Improvement
12
Social Justice Collaborative
Social justice collaborative is californias leading provider of compassionate full scope deportation defense legal services to low income non-citizens in northern and central california. we boldly provide post-convition relief to…
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pomona Economic Opportunity Center and the most unlike its peers is Sigma Beta Xi Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$215,668Employment$85,150Housing & Shelter$69,063Environment$54,221Religion$45,890Public Benefit$41,642Education$33,480
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INLAND CONGREGATIONS UNITED FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds STARTING OVER INC ↗
- Who funds ALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds WAREHOUSE WORKER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COLLECTIVE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Congregations Organized for Prophetic Engagement ↗
- Who funds SIGMA BETA XI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR A NEW CALIFORNIA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MENTORING ACTION NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · Tides Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Southern California Grantmakers · Common Counsel Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Tides Center · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Inland Empire United funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WAREHOUSE WORKER RESOURCE CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 452287926 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on WAREHOUSE WORKER RESOURCE CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Inland Empire United?
Find your warmest path to Inland Empire United through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines