Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Infinity Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$379k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$545kEnvironment$385kEducation$302kPhilanthropy$240kRecreation & Sports$100kCrime & Legal$60kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$9,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ERIE CO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$260,336
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$36,000
ALTAR FLY FISHING$20,000
THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER$14,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$14,000
PLEASANT HILL OUTDOOR CAMP$10,000
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$9,000
FRONTIERS$5,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIBLE MISSION$4,000
HURON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
CRU$2,000
KOOTENAI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$2,000
COMMUNITAS INTERNATIONAL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ANSWERING THE CALL TOGETHER INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 17 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -75% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-75%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $159k · revenue +19%
  • AF
    ALTAR FLY FISHING
    4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +62%
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • FF
    FTMC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • WF
    WHITNEY FIELD IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • NA
    NORWALK ARTS CENTER LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +311%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Christian University

Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…

Education
2
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
3
Lutheran Outdoor Ministries in Ohio

To inspire people to embrace their callings in creation and community by connecting people with nature and faith.

4
Defiance College

Defiance College graduates students to lead distinctive lives in their chosen professions through a spirit of service by preparing them to Know, To Understand, To Lead, and To Serve.

Education
5
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
6
Huntington University

Huntington university is a christ centered institution that exists to carry out the mission of christ in higher education through a curriculum of academic excellence.

Education
7
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Wooster Christian School Inc

The mission of wooster christian school is to prepare students for the future through excellence in christian education.

10
Alfred University

Alfred University's mission is helping students realize their purpose. People living a life of purpose enjoy longer and happier lives. Alfred University promotes its mission through three core strengths - Intersections, Mentorship, and…

Education
11
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher-Titus Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Firelands Rails to Trails Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ERIE CO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $385,336 · OtherERIE CO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $379,080 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $76,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLEASANT HILL OUTDOOR CAMP — $62,500 · OtherPLEASANT HILL OUTDOOR CAMPFTMC FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherFTMC FOUNDATION+10 more — $107,500 · Other+10 moreHURON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $239,500 · PhilanthropyHURON COUNTY COMMUNIT…ALTAR FLY FISHING — $80,000 · PhilanthropyALTAR FLY FISHINGTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER — $159,000 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF …ALLEGHENY COLLEGE — $63,000 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLE…KOOTENAI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $19,500 · EducationKOOTENAI VALLEY…MIO Frontiers — $40,000 · ReligionResourcing Christian Education International — $3,600 · ReligionWHITNEY FIELD IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE — $35,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsANSWERING THE CALL TOGETHER INC — $4,600 · Human Services
Other$1,070,816Philanthropy$319,500Education$241,500Religion$43,600Recreation & Sports$37,000Human Services$4,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHURON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $239,500 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER — $159,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALTAR FLY FISHING — $80,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE — $63,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMIO Frontiers — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY FIELD IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE — $35,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetKOOTENAI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $19,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetNORWALK ARTS CENTER LLC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetFISHER-TITUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetANSWERING THE CALL TOGETHER INC — $4,600 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetResourcing Christian Education International — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRELANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HURON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER
  • Who funds ALTAR FLY FISHING
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers
  • Who funds WHITNEY FIELD IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE
  • Who funds KOOTENAI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds NORWALK ARTS CENTER LLC
  • Who funds FISHER-TITUS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANSWERING THE CALL TOGETHER INC
  • Who funds Resourcing Christian Education International
  • Who funds FIRELANDS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds FIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Geotrac Charitable FoundationOH17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Geotrac Charitable Foundation · The Twenty First Century Foundation · The Albert G & Olive H Schlink Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Infinity Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph