Skip to content
Inclusa Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Inclusa Foundation Inc

Inclusa foundation's mission is to enhance the health of wisconsinites by building diverse and inclusive communities where all people live more connected lives through innovation, programs, and partnerships that impact overall health and well being.

$4.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$352k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.5MHuman Services$1.1MEmployment$607kEnvironment$203kHousing & Shelter$93kEducation$60kFood & Nutrition$50kRecreation & Sports$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $2,182,499, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,732,798 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,550,299 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $666k
$75,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$224M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISCONSIN BOARD FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES$351,608
NATIONAL LEADERSHIP CONSORTIUM (NLC) ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AN AFFIL$314,500
AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF DUNN COUNTY$240,120
KINNICKINNIC RIVER LAND TRUST$202,605
DISABILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS NETWORK$119,962
OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC$115,375
STATE OF WISCONSIN BOARD ON AGING AND LONG TERM CARE$110,500
APTIV INC$110,369
AFAR INC$100,000
LIVING OUR VISIONS INC$75,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA$75,000
RISE INC$60,000
JOURNEY21 INC$50,000
FOOD FOR HEALTH INC$50,000
RIVER VALLY TRAILS INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $486k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUNSHINE HOUSE INC: $5k → 8%CHALLENGE CENTER INC: $48k → 11%CLARITY CARE INC: $6k → 11%HIGHLINE CORPORATION: $12k → 11%HEADWATERS INC: $26k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $22k → 12%AFAR INC: $100k → 17%NORTHWOODS INCORPORATED OF WISCONSIN: $9k → 8%CHIPPEWA RIVER INDUSTRIES INC: $39k → 10%DISABILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS NETWORK: $120k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $13k → 17%ENDEAVORS ADULT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $23k → 9%CREATIVE COMMUNITY LIVING SERVICES INC CCLS: $32k → 10%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $5k → 11%INDIANHEAD ENTERPRISES INC: $5k → 11%ADAPTIVE COMMUNITIES INC: $6k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LA CROSSE INC: $8k → 12%HOMME HEIGHTS INC DBA FOREST PARK VILLAGE: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$459k · 3 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
77

Total granted

$459k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthEducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    APTIV INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $203k · revenue +11%
  • OD
    OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $176k · revenue +7%
  • RI
    RISE INCORPORATED
    2× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • VA
    VERNON AREA REHABILITATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $116k · revenue +28%
  • NC
    North Central Health Care
    one grant, 2020 · $78k
  • RE
    REGIONAL ENTERPRISES FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $49k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
2
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
3
Diversified Services Inc

To provide training and independent living skills to individuals with development disabilities so they may become as self-reliant as possible and lead more meaningful lives in the community.

Employment
4
Achieving Independence and Mobility Cil

Independent living services for persons with disabilities.

Human Services
5
Community Workshop & Training Center Inc

Our central Illinois organization provides programs and services to adults with disabilities; enriching their quality of life, promoting social change, and optimizing their potential for independence.

Human Services
6
Crossroads Industries Inc

Provides work activity for the mentally and physically disabled.

Employment
7
Vocational Solutions of Henderson County Inc

Developmental and rehabilitation services for disabled individuals

—
8
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
9
Able Inc

A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…

Human Services
10
Riverview Industries Inc

To provide a meaningful work experience and quality of life for the benefit of adults with developmental disabilities

Employment
11
Quality Employment Services and Training Inc

Nonprofit organization dedicated to providing vocational and life skill training to people with disabilities.

Employment
12
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aptiv Inc; the most unlike its peers is Park Place Adult Day Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
38/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WISCONSIN BOARD FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $351,608 · OtherWISCONSIN BOARD FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIESTHE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $314,500 · OtherTHE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WI…DUNN COUNTY OFFICE ON AGING: $240,120 · OtherDUNN COUNTY OFFICE ON AGINGVERNON AREA REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $115,910 · OtherVERNON AREA REHABILITATION CENTER INCSTATE OF WISCONSIN BOARD ON AGING AND LONG TERM CARE: $110,500 · OtherSTATE OF WISCONSIN BOARD ON AGING AND LONG TERM CARENorth Central Health Care: $77,737 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC: $75,000 · Other+47 more: $737,664 · Other+47 moreDISABILITY SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK INC: $119,962 · Human ServicesDISABILITY SER…AFAR INC DBA THE ABILITY CENTER: $100,000 · Human ServicesAFAR INC DBA T…CHALLENGE CENTER INC: $47,981 · Human ServicesCHALLENGE CENT…CHIPPEWA RIVER INDUSTRIES INC: $39,023 · Human ServicesCHIPPEWA RIVER…CREATIVE COMMUNITY LIVING SERVICES INCORPORATED: $31,941 · Human ServicesCREATIVE COMMU…HEADWATERS INC: $26,064 · Human ServicesHEADWATERS INCENDEAVORS ADULT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $22,918 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $22,377 · Human Services+10 more: $75,790 · Human Services+10 moreOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $176,369 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY D…RISE INCORPORATED: $79,763 · EmploymentRISE INCORPOR…KANDU INDUSTRIES INC: $45,116 · EmploymentKANDU INDUSTR…HANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC: $24,870 · EmploymentHANDISHOP IND…PORTAL INC: $23,988 · EmploymentPORTAL INCGREENCO INDUSTRIES INC: $23,932 · EmploymentGREENCO INDUS…LE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $17,677 · EmploymentPROACT INC: $17,609 · Employment+4 more: $31,743 · Employment+4 moreAPTIV INC: $202,642 · Housing & ShelterJourney 21 Inc: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterKINNICKINNIC RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $202,605 · EnvironmentRIVER VALLEY TRAILS INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentLIVING OUR VISIONS INC dba LOV Inc: $75,000 · HealthFOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $50,000 · HealthGRACE LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC: $32,579 · HealthAMERY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $23,547 · Health+2 more: $11,073 · HealthHODAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $46,576 · EducationHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $25,000 · EducationST COLETTA OF WISCONSIN INC: $7,672 · EducationASPIRO INC: $5,357 · Education
Other$2,023,039Human Services$486,056Employment$441,067Housing & Shelter$252,642Environment$252,605Health$192,199Education$84,605

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COUNCIL ON QUALITY & LEADERSHIP IN SUPPORTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $314,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAPTIV INC: $202,642 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKINNICKINNIC RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $202,605 over 1y, 69% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $176,369 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDISABILITY SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK INC: $119,962 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetVERNON AREA REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $115,910 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAFAR INC DBA THE ABILITY CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetRISE INCORPORATED: $79,763 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING OUR VISIONS INC dba LOV Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetRIVER VALLEY TRAILS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetJourney 21 Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetREGIONAL ENTERPRISES FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN INC: $49,340 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHALLENGE CENTER INC: $47,981 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHODAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $46,576 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKANDU INDUSTRIES INC: $45,116 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGOOD NEWS PROJECT INC: $42,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCHIPPEWA RIVER INDUSTRIES INC: $39,023 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOPPORTUNITY OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $38,488 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC: $32,579 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE COMMUNITY LIVING SERVICES INCORPORATED: $31,941 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVENTURES UNLIMITED INC: $30,350 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCoalition of Wisconsin Aging Groups: $26,925 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetHEADWATERS INC: $26,064 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHANDISHOP INDUSTRIES INC: $24,870 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPORTAL INC: $23,988 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGREENCO INDUSTRIES INC: $23,932 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $23,547 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetENDEAVORS ADULT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $22,918 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $22,377 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST OPPORTUNITIES CENTER INC: $19,901 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $17,878 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLE PHILLIPS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $17,677 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROACT INC: $17,609 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO HOPE: $16,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBETHANY-ST JOSEPH CORPORATION: $15,311 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK RIVER INDUSTRIES INC: $13,143 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $12,957 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE FOR COMMUNITY LIFE INC: $12,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHIGHLINE CORPORATION: $11,572 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBETHANY LUTHERAN HOMES INC: $10,402 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS INC OF WISCONSIN: $9,190 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese: $7,831 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST COLETTA OF WISCONSIN INC: $7,672 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN VALLEY INDUSTRIES INC: $7,535 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDIVERSIFIED SERVICES CENTER INC: $7,287 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wisconsin State Counc…Otto Bremer TrustGreen Bay Packers Fou…Wispact IncGreater Green Bay Com…Ba & Esther Greenheck…La Crosse Community F…Community Foundation …Alliant Energy Founda…Greater Milwaukee Fou…St Croix Valley Found…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…
Wisconsin State Council Knights of ColumbusWI30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wisconsin State Council Knights of Columbus · Otto Bremer Trust · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Wispact Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · La Crosse Community Foundation · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · St Croix Valley Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inclusa Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inclusa Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Inclusa Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Inclusa Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Inclusa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home