Skip to content

· Private foundation

In Vivo Productions Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$14kHealth$3kYouth Development$2kCrime & Legal$1kAnimals$258Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$951k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL$1,000
CHUANG STAGE INC$608
FRESH INC THEATRE$579
GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES LLC$525
THE DRAMATISTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$500
AARONS PRESENTS$500
THE BOSTON PLAYWRIGHTS THEATRE$500
EXPRESS YOURSELF$500
LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE$500
COMPANY ONE THEATER$500
THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%FLAT EARTH THEATRE: $250 → 8%WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL: $1k → 8%EXPRESS YOURSELF: $1k → 10%COMPANY ONE THEATER: $500 → 16%INDIEGOGO: $55 → 10%LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $500 → 11%ST BALDICKS FOUNDATIOM: $250 → 14%THE DRAMATISTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $500 → 17%COLUMBUS HUMANE: $258 → 15%THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER: $500 → 8%WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL: $1k → 8%EXPRESS YOURSELF: $1k → 10%COMPANY ONE THEATER: $250 → 16%LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $250 → 11%THE DRAMATISTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $500 → 17%THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER: $500 → 8%WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL: $1k → 8%EXPRESS YOURSELF: $500 → 10%FRESH INK THEATRE: $250 → 16%PAC ARTS: $100 → 11%DRAMATISTS GUILD LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $250 → 17%THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER: $500 → 8%WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL: $500 → 8%EXPRESS YOURSELF: $500 → 10%COMPANY ONE: $25 → 16%GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES LLC: $525 → 11%DRAMATISTS GUILD LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $250 → 17%THEATER COMMUNITY BENEVOLENT FUND: $250 → 8%WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL: $500 → 8%AARONS PRESENTS: $500 → 10%BOSTON PLAYWRIGHT THEATRE: $500 → 16%SAN DIEGO REPERTORY THEATRE: $250 → 11%WINSOR MUSIC: $250 → 8%AARONS PRESENTS: $500 → 10%BOSTON PLAYWRIGHT THEATRE: $500 → 16%AARONS PRESENTS: $500 → 10%THE BOSTON PLAYWRIGHTS THEATRE: $500 → 16%AARONS PRESENTS: $500 → 10%THE BOSTON PLAYWRIGHTS THEATRE: $500 → 16%BOSTON PLAYWRIGHT THEATRE: $500 → 16%BOSTON DANCE THEATRE: $250 → 16%BOSTON DANCE THEATRE: $250 → 16%CHUANG STAGE INC: $608 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 13 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$18k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-9%

Still filing today

38%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EXPRESS YOURSELF INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +38%
  • AP
    AARONS PRESENTS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +64%
  • TA
    THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $750 · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CH
    COLUMBUS HUMANEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $258 · revenue +78%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO REPERTORY THEATRE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250 · revenue -101%
  • SB
    ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250 · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Tank Ltd

The Tank is a small, Manhattan-based non-profit arts presenter and producer serving emerging artists. Our goal is to remove economic barriers from the creation of new work for artists launching their careers or experimenting within their…

Arts & Culture
2
The Center for International Theatre Development
Arts & Culture
3
The Russian Arts Theatre and Studio

Develop recognition of international theater

Arts & Culture
4
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
5
Artists Repertory Theatre

Artists repertory theatre's mission is to produce intimate, provacative theatre and provide a home for a diverse community of artists and audiences to take creative risks.

Arts & Culture
6
Staretthe Directors Company Inc

The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…

Arts & Culture
7
Actors Company of Natick

The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.

Arts & Culture
8
Lively Productions

Lively productions presents new work for the stage by emerging artists, and seeks to create innovative theatrical opportunities in a world increasingly defined by real time interactions and new technologies

Arts & Culture
9
The American Playwriting Foundation
—
10
React Theatre

Charitable and Educational. Non-Profit Theatre Company inculcating in the general public a greater appreciation of the dramatic and performing arts.

Arts & Culture
11
One Light Theatre Co
Arts & Culture
12
Uprising Theater
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dramatists Legal Defense Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chuang Stage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AARONS PRESENTS INC: $2,000 · OtherAARONS PRESENTS INCTHE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER: $1,500 · OtherTHE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTERBOSTON PLAYWRIGHT THEATRE: $1,500 · OtherBOSTON PLAYWRIGHT THEATREFRESH INC THEATRE: $1,079 · OtherFRESH INC THEATRETHE BOSTON PLAYWRIGHTS THEATRE: $1,000 · OtherTHE BOSTON PLAYWRIGHTS THEATRECOMPANY ONE THEATER: $750 · OtherCOMPANY ONE THEATERFRESH INK THEATRE: $579 · OtherFRESH INK THEATREGIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES LLC: $525 · OtherDRAMATISTS GUILD LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $500 · OtherBOSTON DANCE THEATRE: $500 · Other+5 more: $905 · Other+5 moreWOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureWOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL INCEXPRESS YOURSELF INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureEXPRESS YOURSELF INCTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $750 · Arts & CultureTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY …Chuang Stage Inc: $608 · Arts & CultureChuang Stage Inc+2 more: $275 · Arts & CultureDRAMATISTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $258 · AnimalsST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$10,838Arts & Culture$8,633Civil Rights$1,000Animals$258Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetEXPRESS YOURSELF INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAARONS PRESENTS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDRAMATISTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChuang Stage Inc: $608 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPANY ONE INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODS HOLE FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPRESS YOURSELF INC ↗
  • Who funds AARONS PRESENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DRAMATISTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Chuang Stage Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO REPERTORY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WINSOR MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPANY ONE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In Vivo Productions Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In Vivo Productions Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Chuang Stage Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Woods Hole Film Festival Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Company One Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to In Vivo Productions Inc?

Find your warmest path to In Vivo Productions Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on In Vivo Productions’ filings →

More from the funding graph