Skip to content

· Community foundation

Imperial Valley Community Foundation

To Champion local philanthropy to benefit the Imperial Valley community by helping donors fulfill their philanthropic goals while preserving enduring charitable assets forever.

$455k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$341kEnvironment$126kHealth$100kAnimals$72kCommunity Improvement$48kFood & Nutrition$32kCivil Rights$25kArts & Culture$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $359,837, the rows itemized in this filing. The $454,661 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $94,824 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Calipatria Unified School Dis$100,000
Autism Support of Imperial Co$100,000
Imperial Valley College Found$23,920
Imperial Valley Trails & Land$18,707
Pacific Coast Conservation Al$17,660
California Polytechnic State$15,000
City of Calipatria$12,500
Imperial Unified School Distr$10,000
Grand Canyon University$10,000
Imp County Historical Society$10,000
CASA of Imperial County$9,800
San Diego State University$8,750
San Diego State Research Foun$7,000
Imperial Valley Challenger LL$5,750
University of Calif - Davis$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Best Step Forward Calip PAL: $6k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 9 repeat orgs$473k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$322k
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+4%

Still filing today

56%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentCrime & LegalHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PACIFIC COAST CONSERVATION ALLIANCE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +62% · 33% of their budget
  • IV
    Imperial Valley College Foundation
    3× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +118%
  • CA
    Court Appointed Special Advocates of Imperial County
    3× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CU
    Calipatria Unified School Dis
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • CH
    Calipatria High School
    one grant, 2024 · $43k
  • IV
    IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Imperial Valley Wellness Foundation

IVWF partners with local non-profit organizations to address pressing health issues for Imperial County's most vulnerable populations. IVWF provides funding for efforts addressing healthy eating, active living: community prevention linked…

Health
2
Imperial Regional Alliance Inc

IRA has a mission to improve the quality of life of low to moderate income populations of Imperial Valley by providing a link between education, job training and employment opportunities. This organization develops and pursues initiatives…

Community Improvement
3
Imperial Valley Community Foundation

To Champion local philanthropy to benefit the Imperial Valley community by helping donors fulfill their philanthropic goals while preserving enduring charitable assets forever.

Philanthropy
4
Irwindale Educational Foundation
—
5
Indian Valley Public Library Foundation of Friends
Philanthropy
6
Inland Valleys Association of Realtors

The core purpose of IVAR is to help its members become more professional and profitable, while promoting and protecting real property rights.

Membership Benefit
7
United Way of Imperial County

The United Way of Imperial County raises money in Imperial County from People in the work place, businesses, and individuals to help support agencies that serve the community.

Philanthropy
8
Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Collective

The Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Collective creates a safe space for immigrant youth to express themselves and achieve their full potential and their identity that intersects with being undocumented. Through grassroots organizing, our…

Human Services
9
Imperial Valley Economic Development Cor

The imperial valley economic development corporation's mission is marketing of imperial county as a region to attract new business and industry. increasing capital investment, local commerce, employment and tax revenue. maintaining a…

Community Improvement
10
Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium

Ierbc: support improved broadband, smart community strategies, and bridging the digital divide. this includes outreach, collaboration, and engagement with community stakeholders, businesses, government, and other groups

Public Benefit
11
San Luis Valley Immigrant Resource

Connect and empower immigrants with resources to achieve legal documentation, fullfill their economic needs, and integrate into the community

Crime & Legal
12
Irwindale Chamber of Commerce Inc

Business and Civic Promotion for the businesses and residents of the City of Irwindale, CA

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Imperial Valley; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Coast Conservation Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUTISM IMPERIAL COUNTY: $100,000 · OtherAUTISM IMPERIAL COUNTYCalipatria Unified School Dis: $100,000 · OtherCalipatria Unified School DisREPUBLIC SERVICES INC: $69,312 · OtherREPUBLIC SERVICES INCCalipatria Unified School Dis: $60,000 · OtherCalipatria Unified School DisCalipatria High School: $42,735 · OtherCalipatria High SchoolIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $32,365 · OtherIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANKIMPERIAL VALLEY TRAILS AND LAND CONSERVANCY: $29,028 · OtherIMPERIAL VALLEY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $24,979 · Other+13 more: $142,010 · Other+13 morePACIFIC COAST CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $89,578 · EnvironmentPACIFIC COAS…Imperial Valley College Foundation: $39,751 · EducationImperial …Grand Canyon University: $18,000 · EducationGrand Can…SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationSAN DIEGO…Court Appointed Special Advocates of Imperial County: $24,900 · Civil RightsSoroptimist International of El Centro: $10,000 · Crime & LegalBEST STEP FORWARD: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$600,429Environment$89,578Education$64,751Civil Rights$24,900Crime & Legal$10,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFIC COAST CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $89,578 over 5y, 33% of budgetImperial Valley College Foundation: $39,751 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $32,365 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $24,979 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Imperial County: $24,900 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $17,600 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSoroptimist International of El Centro: $10,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY DESERT MUSEUM SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF IMPERIAL VALLEY: $8,860 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST STEP FORWARD: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFIC COAST CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Imperial Valley College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL VALLEY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Imperial County ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Soroptimist International of El Centro ↗
  • Who funds IMPERIAL VALLEY DESERT MUSEUM SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF IMPERIAL VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEST STEP FORWARD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Citizens Energy Corporation · Berkshire Hathaway Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Imperial Valley Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Imperial Valley Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Imperial Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph