Skip to content

· Private foundation

Impac Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Environment$20kHealth$16kArts & Culture$14kRecreation & Sports$11kEducation$10kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$7kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATIONS UNDERGROUND RAILROAD$10,000
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION$10,000
ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION$10,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
ACADEMY OF MUSIC FOR THE BLIND$4,000
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$4,000
PATRIOTS & PAWS$3,000
ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY$3,000
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION$2,500
LAURA'S HOUSE$2,500
WILDOMAR COMMUNITY AND PARKS FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $3k → 10%PATRIOTS & PAWS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Seva Foundation

Seva foundation partners worldwide to create self-sustaining programs that preserve and restore sight. our vision is a world free of avoidable blindness.

International
4
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
5
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
6
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
7
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
8
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

To saves lives and bring hope to those affected by suicide.

Health
9
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
10
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
11
Santa Barbara Foundation

The mission of the santa barbara foundation (sbf) is to mobilize collective wisdom and philanthropic capital to build empathetic, inclusive and resilient communities.

Philanthropy
12
Spot

SPOT Saving Pets One at a Time is a leading San Diego County all-volunteer rescue organization whose main focus is to save dogs and cats in shelters who are at risk of euthanization and to help other dogs and cats in need as well. In…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Weaver. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKCHOC HOSPITAL: $4,430 · OtherCHOC HOSPITALAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PRE…THE DRESSES AND DREAMS PROJECT: $1,750 · OtherTHE DRESSES AND DREAMS PROJECTPATRIOTS AND PAWS: $3,000 · OtherPATRIOTS AND PAWSLAURA'S HOUSE: $2,500 · OtherLAURA'S HOUSEONEOC: $4,050 · OtherONEOC+5 more: $2,650 · Other+5 moreSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATI…OUR RESCUE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUEAcademy of Music for the Blind: $4,000 · Arts & CultureAcademy of Musi…MIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $10,100 · Recreation & SportsMIRACLES FO…+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Crime & LegalORANGEWOOD …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SIL…ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $3,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2,500 · Health
Other$32,380Environment$20,000Arts & Culture$14,000Recreation & Sports$10,350Crime & Legal$10,000Education$10,000Health$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $10,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONEOC: $4,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAcademy of Music for the Blind: $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOTS AND PAWS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Weaver: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impac Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impac Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impac’s filings →

More from the funding graph