Loading…
· Public charity
IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES RESPONSE COLLABORATIVE INC
We are a coalition of immigration legal advocates that works on increasing access to justice and access to counsel for all immigrant new yorkers.
$245k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
2
Communities
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Human Services$125kRecreation & Sports$70kCrime & Legal$30kCivil Rights$10kOther$100k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
safetyrepresentationlow-income
2023
—
2024
—
2025
building
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
- EDITH AND CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE OF BENSONHURST$45,000
- HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES INC$35,000
- UKRAINE IMMIGRATION TASK FORCE INC$35,000
- WNY COALITION OF FARMWORKER SERVING AGENCIES INC$30,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 39% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$210k · 3 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
9
Total granted
$210k
$95k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+44%
+61%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES INC2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +682%
- UIUKRAINE IMMIGRATION TASK FORCE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · 42% of their budget
- EAEDITH AND CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE OF BENSONHURST2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- UUNLOCALgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +1317%
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIESone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -2%
BROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Legal Services of Central New York Inc
Legal services of central new york (lscny)is a 501c3 non-profit law firm that helps people and communities in central new york change law, policy, and systems to promote equity and create pathways out of poverty for low-income families and…
Crime & Legal
2
Legal Assistance of Western New York Inc
Lawny increases access to justice through excellent legal representation, advocacy and service.
Crime & Legal
3
Legal Services Nyc
Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…
Crime & Legal
4
Worker Justice Center of New York Inc
Provides legal assistance to farmworkers and other low wage workers in New York State.
Crime & Legal
5
Federal Defenders of New York Inc
The organization provides representation and related defense services to indigent persons charged with federal crimes.
Crime & Legal
6
The Bronx Defenders
The bronx defenders provides legal representation and other related services to more than 20,000 low-income people in the bronx, every year, free of charge.
Crime & Legal
7
Lsny-Bronx Corporation
Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.
Education
8
Manhattan Legal Services
Manhattan legal services is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.
Crime & Legal
9
Brooklyn Legal Services Inc
Brooklyn legal services, inc is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.
Crime & Legal
10
Northern Manhattan Coalition
to educate, defend and protect the rights of immigrants. Recognized by the Board of Immigration Appeals, NMCIR is committed to expanding access to legal immigration services, participating in policy making and community organizing.
Community Improvement
11
The Legal Aid Society of
Advocates for justice and equal treatment under the law, providing constitutionally mandated legal representation to persons financially unable to hire counsel.
—
12
Refugee & Immigrant Center for
Direct legal and social services and advocacy for immigrants, asylum-seekers, and refugees.
Civil Rights
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Metropolitan and the most unlike its peers is Ukraine Immigration Task Force Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$125,000Other$100,000Recreation & Sports$70,000Crime & Legal$30,000Civil Rights$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINE IMMIGRATION TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds EDITH AND CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE OF BENSONHURST ↗
- Who funds WNY COALITION OF FARMWORKER SERVING AGENCIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNLOCAL ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK'S IMMIGRATION LEGAL PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL DISTRICT WOMEN'S BAR ASSOCIATION LEGAL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The New York Community TrustNY17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Immigrant Justice Corps Inc · Equal Justice Works · Robin Hood Foundation · New York Immigration Coalition Inc · The New York Bar Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation IMMIGRANT ADVOCATES RESPONSE COLLABORATIVE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 813361872 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Immigrant Advocates Response Collaborative Inc?
Find your warmest path to Immigrant Advocates Response Collaborative Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines