Skip to content

· Public charity

Immaculate Heart Community

The mission statement of the IMMACULATE HEART COMMUNITY states it is an inclusive ecumenical community, which seeks to create access for all persons to truth, equity, justice and peace through spiritual development, education, the arts, and taking action that fosters care for the earth and all beings.

$358k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$22MArts & Culture$4.9MHealth$273kCivil Rights$41kCrime & Legal$21kInternational$16kHuman Services$15kEnvironment$13k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $307,954, the rows itemized in this filing. The $357,574 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $49,620 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $191k
$12,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$82M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORITA ART CENTER$191,006
CLERGY & LAITY UNITED FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE$41,000
I DEMAND ACCESS$15,948
INTERFAITH REFUGEE & IMMIGRATION SERVICE$15,000
ENVIRONMENTALISM THROUGH INSPIRITIANS & NON-VIOLENT ACTION$12,500
PACIFIC JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER$10,500
THE CHICAGO SCHOOL - CALIFORNIA INC$10,000
EMANATE HEALTH FOUNDATION$6,000
HOUSING WORKS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $25k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
Contemporary Art Review Los Angeles

Contemporary Art Review Los Angeles (Carla) is a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization and publishing platform that is dedicated to providing inclusive perspectives on contemporary art. Publishing in both print and online, Carla is an…

Arts & Culture
3
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
4
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
5
Commonweal

Engage in educational, charitable and research activities which contribute to the health of individuals, to public health and to the health of the global environment.

Human Services
6
Urban Tilth

Urban Tilth is a California nonprofit organization committed to educate diverse communities about organic gardening and to support a network of gardens dedicated to sustainable, local food production. Urban Tilth insipires, hires, and…

Environment
7
Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.

Science & Tech
8
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights

To advance the human & civil rights of immigrants & refugees in los angeles; promote harmonious multi-ethnic human relations.

Civil Rights
9
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
10
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
11
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
12
California Coalition for Rural Housing Project

The California Coalition for Rural Housing (CCRH) advocates for a thriving rural California by expanding affordable housing opportunitiies for rural, Tribal and farmworker communities. Founded in 1976, CCRH is one of the nation's oldest…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing Works; the most unlike its peers is I Demand Access. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA CASA DE MARIA: $22,103,229 · OtherLA CASA DE MARIACORITA ART CENTER: $4,696,966 · OtherCORITA ART CENTER+6 more: $324,346 · OtherCORITA ART CENTER INC: $191,006 · Arts & CultureClergy and Laity United for Economic Justice: $41,000 · Civil RightsALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $30,984 · Human ServicesI DEMAND ACCESS: $15,948 · InternationalENVIRONMENTALISM THROUGH INSPIRATION & NONVIOLENT ACTION: $12,500 · EnvironmentCalifornia Youth Defender Center Inc: $10,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$27,124,541Arts & Culture$191,006Civil Rights$41,000Human Services$30,984International$15,948Environment$12,500Crime & Legal$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORITA ART CENTER INC: $191,006 over 1y, 29% of budgetClergy and Laity United for Economic Justice: $41,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $30,984 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetI DEMAND ACCESS: $15,948 over 1y, 11% of budgetENVIRONMENTALISM THROUGH INSPIRATION & NONVIOLENT ACTION: $12,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCalifornia Youth Defender Center Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Chicago School - California Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmanate Health Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSING WORKS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Immaculate Heart Community funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Immaculate Heart Community. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Immaculate Heart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph