Skip to content

· Public charity

Illinois Manufacturers' Association Education Foundation

To foster and promote vocational, educational, charitable and scientific interests including activities which foster accountability, freedom of choice, incentives for students and teachers, and excellence in pre-employment education, and, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations.

$181k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$718kEmployment$263kInternational$210kCommunity Improvement$81kScience & Tech$75kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $161,402, the rows itemized in this filing. The $181,466 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,064 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GACC MIDWEST$44,250
NORTHERN IL UNIVERSITY$22,152
SOUTHWESTERN IL COLLEGE$15,000
MCHENRY COLLEGE$12,500
ELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$12,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
NORTHWEST EDUC COUNCIL FOR STUDENT SERVICES$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
MT VERNON AREA VOCATIONAL CENTER$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEYER INDUSTRIES: $10k → 5%FABRIK PLASTICS: $5k → 6%OAI Inc: $18k → 7%TRITON COLLEGE: $23k → 8%SCHULTES MANUFACTURING: $8k → 8%SOUTHWESTERN IL COLLEGE: $15k → 12%Kishwaukee College: $15k → 13%NORTHWEST EDUC COUNCIL FOR STUDENT SERVICES: $8k → 14%Greater Peoria Econ Development Council: $18k → 14%North American Lighting: $28k → 14%Olney Central College: $8k → 15%MT VERNON AREA VOCATIONAL CENTER: $8k → 15%Richland Community College: $15k → 15%Mchenry College: $36k → 6%OAI INC: $15k → 7%Elgin Community College: $23k → 8%Northern Illinois University: $207k → 13%Wright College: $7k → 14%GREATER PEORIA ECON DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $15k → 14%North American Lighting: $12k → 14%Mt Vernon Area Vocational Center: $8k → 15%MCHENRY COLLEGE: $13k → 6%BBS Automation: $13k → 7%ELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15k → 8%NORTHERN IL UNIVERSITY: $22k → 13%GACC MIDWEST: $165k → 14%Rend Lake College: $8k → 15%RANA MEALL SOLUTIONS: $8k → 7%ELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $13k → 8%Gacc Midwest: $158k → 14%Hermann Ultrasonics: $7k → 7%GACC Midwest: $192k → 8%GACC MIDWEST: $44k → 14%BBS AUTOMATION: $7k → 7%THERMOFORM QUALITY: $5k → 8%Valley Industrial Association: $18k → 14%Golden Corridor Advanced Mfg Partnership: $18k → 7%VALLEY INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%GOLDEN CORRIDOR ADVANCED MFG PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 7%William Rainey Harper College: $117k → 14%WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE: $6k → 14%WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +69% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+69%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE MIDWEST INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $402k · revenue +61%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $229k · revenue +276%
  • GC
    Greater Chicago Advanced Manufacturing Pship NFP
    2× · 2018–2019 · $190k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRITON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $23k
  • KC
    KISHWAUKEE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +13%
  • EC
    ELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oakton Community College Educational Foundation

To enable student success.

Education
2
Illinois Valley Community College Foundation

To assist in providing educational opportunitites.

Education
3
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
4
Gilmore Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Peoria Area Chamber of Commerce

The peoria area chamber of commerce is a membership organization of businesses, delivering value to its members by 1) cultivating a thriving business community, 2) presenting the united voice of local business to government, 3) offering…

—
6
Elgin Area Chamber of Commerce

The Elgin Area Chamber connects communities through engagement, advocacy, collaboration, and leadership.

Community Improvement
7
Illinois Manufacturers' Association

To strengthen the economic social environmental and governmental conditions for manufacturing and allied enterprises in the state of illinois, resulting in an englarged business base and increased employment.

—
8
Industrial Council of Nearwest Chicago

Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.

—
9
Eastern Illinois University Foundation

To encourage and provide private support for Eastern Illinois University and its educational mission through scholarships and grants

Education
10
Friends of Mchenry County College Foundation

Together with our community we build financial support for student learning and success.

Education
11
College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin

The College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin (CCIW) exists to serve a select group of private colleges and universities of similar size and heritage, which share a deep commitment to superior undergraduate education and a common…

Recreation & Sports
12
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Illinois College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Northern Illinois University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE MIDWEST INC: $401,538 · OtherGERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE MIDWEST INCEDC INC GREATER PEORIA ECONOMIC DEV COUNCIL: $63,750 · OtherEDC INC GREATER PEORIA ECONOMIC DEV COUNCILVALLEY INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · OtherVALLEY INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $39,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+14 more: $150,625 · Other+14 moreNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $229,248 · EducationNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDA…WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $143,000 · EducationWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCA…ELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $7,500 · EducationGreater Chicago Advanced Manufacturing Pship NFP: $190,492 · Community ImprovementGreater Chicago…OAI Inc: $50,000 · Employment
Other$694,913Education$429,748Community Improvement$190,492Employment$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE MIDWEST INC: $401,538 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $229,248 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $143,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetEDC INC GREATER PEORIA ECONOMIC DEV COUNCIL: $63,750 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetOAI Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVALLEY INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetOLNEY CENTRAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE MIDWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Chicago Advanced Manufacturing Pship NFP ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDC INC GREATER PEORIA ECONOMIC DEV COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds OAI Inc ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ELGIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KISHWAUKEE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLNEY CENTRAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Manufacturers' Association Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Manufacturers' Association Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Manufacturers' Association Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph