Skip to content

· Public charity

Illinois Alcohol & Other Drug Abuse Professional Cert Association Inc

To protect the public by providing competency based credentialing of human service professionals.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$494k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Employment$4.0M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $1,779,068, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,930,666 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,598 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $636k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$148,309
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AURORA UNIVERSITY$494,330
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$389,887
THE CHICAGO SCHOOL$250,000
GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY$230,430
UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS$148,309
COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY$92,526
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$82,569
LEWIS UNIVERSITY$82,355
COLLEGE OF DUPAGE$8,662
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COLLEGE OF DUPAGE: $9k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $148k → 7%AURORA UNIVERSITY: $520k → 8%COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY: $340k → 8%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $390k → 14%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $186k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $125k → 7%AURORA UNIVERSITY: $494k → 8%COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY: $93k → 8%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $194k → 14%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $83k → 23%LEWIS UNIVERSITY: $82k → 7%KENNEDY KING COLLEGE: $190k → 14%GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY: $507k → 7%THE CHICAGO SCHOOL: $250k → 14%GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY: $230k → 7%THE CHICAGO SCHOOL: $198k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 7 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$3.8M
$190k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AURORA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +6%
  • GS
    Governors State University
    2× · 2024–2025 · $737k
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    2× · 2024–2025 · $584k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • CC
    City Colleges of Chicago
    one grant, 2024 · $190k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AURORA UNIVERSITY: $1,014,330 · EducationAURORA UNIVERSITYLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $583,887 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology: $448,000 · EducationThe Chicago School of Professional PsychologyLewis University: $82,355 · EducationGovernors State University: $737,430 · OtherGovernors State UniversityCollege of Lake County: $432,526 · OtherCollege of Lake CountyUNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $273,309 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCISSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALE: $268,569 · OtherSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALECity Colleges of Chicago: $190,000 · OtherCity Colleges of Chicago+1 more: $8,662 · Other
Education$2,128,572Other$1,910,496

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAURORA UNIVERSITY: $1,014,330 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $583,887 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology: $448,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $273,309 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLewis University: $82,355 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AURORA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago School of Professional Psychology ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds Lewis University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marquette Bank Education FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marquette Bank Education Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Alcohol & Other Drug Abuse Professional Cert Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Alcohol & Other Drug Abuse Professional Cert Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Alcohol & Other Drug Abuse Professional Cert Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph