Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$328k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MEducation$411kArts & Culture$331kYouth Development$228kReligion$224kHuman Services$185kHealth$95kRecreation & Sports$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$125,000
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$50,000
OREL ALLIANCE$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBR FDN$16,000
OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION$11,000
KANEKO$10,000
SIENNA FRANCIS HOUSE$5,000
NORTH STAR FOUNDATION$5,000
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$5,000
CHILD SAVING INST$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,000
OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
OMAHA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$5,000
VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $5k → 6%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $750 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $500 → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $250 → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $18k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $5k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $4k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $4k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $4k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $4k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $3k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $3k → 12%CHILD SAVING INST: $3k → 12%ASSITANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $500 → 12%ASSITANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $100 → 12%ASSITANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $100 → 12%WOMENS'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMENS'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $500 → 12%OREL ALLIANCE: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
CO
NE
AZ
AR
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 73 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

73 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
28

Total granted

$3.1M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+36%

Still filing today

51%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +82%
  • K
    KANEKO
    4× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +45%
  • BC
    BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • RF
    REVIVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
3
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
4
Opera Omaha Inc

Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.

Arts & Culture
5
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
6
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
7
Stand for Schools

Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.

Education
8
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
9
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation

To conduct and support activities for the benefit of the jewish federation of omaha.

Philanthropy
11
Omaha Parks Foundation

The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…

Environment
12
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Children's Museum; the most unlike its peers is Mamie's Poppy Plates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/56
Grantees still filing
39/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $1,211,058 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $247,500 · OtherOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONTEMPLE ISRAEL: $184,913 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL+71 more: $936,864 · Other+71 moreKANEKO: $70,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $37,000 · Arts & CultureOmaha Children's Museum: $35,000 · Arts & CultureRESPECT2: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $16,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $123,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $7,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $45,730 · Human ServicesOREL ALLIANCE: $20,000 · Human ServicesVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $5,000 · Human Services+3 more: $3,700 · Human ServicesOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $52,480 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Animals+2 more: $2,250 · AnimalsKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $22,500 · HealthQUALITY LIVING INC: $11,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $9,500 · HealthA TIME TO HEAL INC: $9,000 · HealthTEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · HealthJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,580,335Arts & Culture$183,000Youth Development$132,000Human Services$74,430Animals$69,730Health$60,500Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $247,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $123,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetKANEKO: $70,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $56,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $52,480 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $50,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $50,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $45,730 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $37,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOmaha Children's Museum: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetRESPECT2: $25,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBellevue University: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $22,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $13,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetQUALITY LIVING INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA TIME TO HEAL INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetArizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVITA NOVA MATERNITY COMMUNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCUES FUND: $4,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS FOR LIVABLE OMAHA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA WILDLIFE REHAB INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATEGIC AIR COMMAND & AEROSPACE MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMIE'S POPPY PLATES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEBRASKA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANEKO ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Omaha Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RESPECT2 ↗
  • Who funds Bellevue University ↗
  • Who funds KICKS FOR A CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds OREL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds GESHER DISABILITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds QUALITY LIVING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE56× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · John K & Lynne D Boyer Foundation · Richard Brooke Foundation · Dr C C and Mabel L Criss Memorial

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ike & Roz Friedman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ike & Roz Friedman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph