Skip to content
Iha Health Services Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Iha Health Services Corporation

We, IHA HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.IHA HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION is a member of trinity health-michigan and trinity health.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$985kPhilanthropy$380kCommunity Improvement$93kHousing & Shelter$83kHuman Services$30kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$10kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $190,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $212,787 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,787 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $140k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$376M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN DBA TH ANN ARBOR HOSPITAL$140,000
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$25,000
HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%OAKWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 8%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $107k → 14%ANN ARBOR TRACK CLUB: $10k → 8%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $93k → 14%ANN ARBOR TRACK CLUB: $5k → 8%ANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%ANN ARBOR TRACK CLUB: $5k → 8%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $51k → 14%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $49k → 14%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $40k → 14%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $20k → 14%UNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $20k → 14%ANN ARBOR SPARK: $15k → 14%ANN ARBOR SPARK: $15k → 14%ANN ARBOR SPARK: $15k → 14%ANN ARBOR SPARK: $15k → 14%ANN ARBOR YPSILANTI REGIONAL CHAMBER: $12k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES ANN ARBOR DIVISION: $12k → 14%ANN ARBOR YPSILANTI REGIONAL CHAMBER: $11k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES ANN ARBOR DIVISION: $5k → 14%ANN ARBOR YPSILANTI REGIONAL CHAMBER: $11k → 14%ELE'S PLACE: $5k → 14%HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $65k → 14%HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $25k → 14%HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $25k → 14%HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $25k → 14%HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC: $25k → 14%INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK OF WASHTENAW COUNTY (DBA ALPHA HOUSE): $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 7 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $803k · revenue +31%
  • AA
    Ann Arbor Spark
    4× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +117%
  • TA
    The Ann Arbor Track Club
    3× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • OC
    OAKWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IH
    Interfaith Hospitality Network of Washtenaw Countygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +83%
  • EP
    ELE'S PLACE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
3
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
6
Hospice of Michigan Inc

Hospice of Michigan, Inc. meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Michigan Peer Review Organization

Helping healthcare get better. MPRO has more than 40 years of experience improving healthcare across the continuum of care using evidence-based and data-driven logic. MPRO also has extensive expertise in completing thoughtful and impartial…

Health
9
Arbor Hospice Inc

To meet our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose, and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
10
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
11
Ann Arbor Spark Foundation

The Ann Arbor SPARK Foundation is an affiliated 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization designed to solicit contributions and promote the charitable purposes of SPARK.

Philanthropy
12
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Interfaith Hospitality Network of Washtenaw County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $802,750 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN+1 more: $17,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $379,640 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTYHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $165,000 · OtherHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INCAnn Arbor Spark: $60,000 · OtherAnn Arbor SparkAnn Arbor Ypsilanti Regional Chamber: $32,500 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $30,000 · OtherANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyInterfaith Hospitality Network of Washtenaw County: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterELE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Health$819,750Other$692,140Philanthropy$75,000Housing & Shelter$7,500Youth Development$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $802,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $379,640 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $165,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetANN ARBOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAnn Arbor Spark: $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAnn Arbor Ypsilanti Regional Chamber: $32,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ann Arbor Track Club: $20,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Hospitality Network of Washtenaw County: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iha Health Services Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iha Health Services Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Iha Health Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home