Skip to content

· Public charity

Igda Foundation

The IGDA FOUNDATION is a global charitable organization serving underrepresented and marginalized developers and individuals interested in a career within the gaming industry.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$55kScience & Tech$46kSocial Science$41kHuman Services$27kPublic Benefit$27kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $25,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$290k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL GAME DEVELOPERS' ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
GIRLS MAKE GAMES SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STACK UP: $15k → 14%STACK UP: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 6 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$178k
$18k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’24
Public BenefitSocial ScienceScience & TechHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GLOBAL GAME JAM INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $41k · revenue +302%
  • TA
    THE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $28k · revenue +79%
  • TT
    Take This Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $27k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • PC
    POWELL CONSULTING GROUP
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beyond the Game Connection Inc
—
2
Gamers Cancer Society Corp

We raise money for research, help families in need, and provide entertainment for those receiving treatment. Advocate for therapy-through-gaming for cancer patients.

—
3
Women in Games International

Women in games international cultivates resources to advance economic equality and diversity in the global games industry.

Employment
4
Learning Games Network Inc
Education
5
Video Game Palooza Inc

The video game palooza foundation is a game industry charity dedicated to improving the lives of people of all ages by utilizing video games and interactive technologies, and by offering education, awareness, and activism within the world…

Education
6
Game Genius Inc

Provide play-based services and experiences to support leaders, organizations, and socially beneficial initiatives in the Greater Washington DC region

Public Benefit
7
Babycastles Studio Inc

Exempt dedicated to building platforms for diversity in video games culture at every level

—
8
Tabletop Gaymers Inc

To raise awareness of lgbt issues within the gaming (board games, role playing games, video games, etc.) community; excluding games involving gambling or wagering.

Civil Rights
9
Portland Indie Game Squad

The Portland Indie Game Squad is a 501(c)3 organization dedicated to supporting the health and continued expansion of game developer and enthusiast communities in Portland, the Pacific Northwest, and online. We provide events, resources,…

Arts & Culture
10
Games for Love

Games for love is dedicated to easing suffering, saving lives, and creating sustainable futures for children.

Human Services
11
Game Devs of Color Inc

Our mission is to amplify the creative power held by people of color in games. we do this by organizing revolutionary events, uniting our vibrant community, and building access to knowledge, funding, and opportunities.

Youth Development
12
Igda Foundation

The igda foundation is a global charitable organization serving underrepresented and marginalized developers and individuals interested in a career within the gaming industry. our mission is to make the game industry more diverse and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Games for Change Inc; the most unlike its peers is Child's Play. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Take This Inc: $27,328 · Public BenefitTake This IncGAMES FOR CHANGE INC: $27,328 · Public BenefitGAMES FOR CHANGE INCGLOBAL GAME JAM INC: $40,593 · Social ScienceGLOBAL GAME JAM INCTHE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC: $28,366 · Science & TechTHE ABLEGAMERS…POWELL CONSULTING GROUP: $18,000 · OtherPOWELL CONSULT…INTERNATIONAL GAME DEVELOPERS ASSOC: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL …STACK UP: $27,328 · Human ServicesSTACK UPCHILD'S PLAY: $27,327 · HealthCHILD'S PLAYGIRLS MAKE GAMES SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · Youth Development
Public Benefit$54,656Social Science$40,593Science & Tech$28,366Other$28,000Human Services$27,328Health$27,327Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL GAME JAM INC: $40,593 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetTHE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC: $28,366 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTake This Inc: $27,328 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGAMES FOR CHANGE INC: $27,328 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSTACK UP: $27,328 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD'S PLAY: $27,327 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS MAKE GAMES SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GAME DEVELOPERS ASSOC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Igda Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Igda Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Igda Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Igda Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Igda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph