Skip to content
Idaho Primary Care Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Idaho Primary Care Association Inc

Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $164,293, the rows itemized in this filing. The $169,293 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $138k
$15,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FULL CIRCLE HEALTH$31,300
COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SPOKANE$22,300
KANIKSU COMMUNITY HEALTH$22,093
HERITAGE HEALTH$15,800
MARIMN HEALTH$15,800
HEALTH WEST INC$15,500
GRAND PEAKS MEDICAL & DENTAL$15,500
TERRY REILLY HEALTH SERVICES$6,500
DESERT SAGE HEALTH CENTERS$6,500
FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES$6,500
ADAMS COUNTY HEALTH CENTER$6,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DESERT SAGE HEALTH CENTERS: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$236k · 6 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$236k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +16%
  • FH
    Family Health Services Corporation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +24%
  • Community Health Association of Spokane
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • VA
    VOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -11%
  • CA
    CHALLIS AREA HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue +3%
  • VF
    VALLEY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
3
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
4
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
5
Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc

To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…

Health
6
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
7
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
8
Community Health Care

To provide the highest quality health care with compassionate and accessible service for all including comprehensive primary medical, dental and behavioral health care through a clinic system.

Health
9
Partnership Health Center Inc

Partnership health center ensures that accessible, comprehensive primary healthcare is provided to the medically underserved population in our region, through a partnership of community resources.

—
10
Teton Valley Health Care

To encourage and support a healthier community.

Health
11
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
12
Black Canyon Community Health Center Inc

Provide medical services to all persons in need in a rural community more than 50 miles from any other service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Challis Area Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Volunteers Against Violence Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC: $31,300 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INCFULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC: $31,300 · HealthFULL CIRCLE HEALTH INCADAMS COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC: $31,300 · HealthADAMS COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INCFamily Health Services Corporation: $31,300 · HealthFamily Health Services CorporationCommunity Health Association of Spokane: $30,900 · HealthCommunity Health Association of SpokaneBOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $30,065 · HealthBOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INCVALLEY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $15,800 · HealthVALLEY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INCHEALTH WEST INC: $15,500 · HealthHEALTH WEST INCUpper Valley Comm Health Services INC: $15,500 · HealthUpper Valley Comm Health Services INC+1 more: $6,500 · HealthDIRNE HEALTH CENTERS INC: $80,809 · OtherDIRNE HEALTH CENTERS INCCOEUR D'ALENE TRIBE: $15,800 · OtherCOEUR D'ALENE TRIBECHALLIS AREA HEALTH CENTER INC: $15,800 · OtherCHALLIS AREA HEALTH CENTER INCVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $24,711 · Human Services
Health$239,465Other$112,409Human Services$24,711

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRNE HEALTH CENTERS INC: $80,809 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC: $31,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC: $31,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAMS COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC: $31,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation: $31,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health Association of Spokane: $30,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOUNDARY REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $30,065 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $24,711 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHALLIS AREA HEALTH CENTER INC: $15,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVALLEY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $15,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH WEST INC: $15,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpper Valley Comm Health Services INC: $15,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLENNS FERRY HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefIdaho Community Found…American Cancer Socie…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Direct ReliefCA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idaho Primary Care Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idaho Primary Care Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Idaho Primary Care Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home