Skip to content

· Public charity

Idacorp Employee Community Services Fund Inc

To assist idaho power company employees in making contributions in an organized basis to charitable, character-building, and health and welfare organizations which are dependent upon voluntary contributions in order to carry out their specific charitable programs and which qualify as exempt organizations pursuant to the provisions of…

$455k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$399kPhilanthropy$366kFood & Nutrition$158kHealth$114kHousing & Shelter$57kYouth Development$31kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $120,505, the rows itemized in this filing. The $455,478 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $334,973 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $97k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC$32,700
IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC$22,005
BOISE RESCUE MISSION INC$17,000
WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$13,100
SALVATION ARMY$12,000
JESSE TREE OF IDAHO$7,500
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH$5,600
INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC$5,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF IDAHO INC$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $18k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $16k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $16k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $15k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $14k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $14k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $13k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $13k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $12k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $12k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $9k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $8k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $8k → 8%CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITY'S HOMELESS INC (CATCH INC): $8k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $8k → 8%JESSE TREE OF IDAHO: $7k → 8%CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITY'S HOMELESS INC (CATCH INC): $6k → 8%CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITY'S HOMELESS INC (CATCH INC): $6k → 8%CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITY'S HOMELESS INC (CATCH INC): $6k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $9k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $6k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $6k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $7k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 8%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-36%

Still filing today

85%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $308k · revenue +51%
  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +48%
  • WA
    Women's and Children's Alliance
    9× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Idaho Primary Care Association Inc

Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support. ipca keeps health centers current on issues and trends affecting the changing healthcare…

—
3
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
4
Children's Home Society of Idaho Inc

Our mission is to improve the lives of children in our community.

Health
5
Teton Valley Health Care

To encourage and support a healthier community.

Health
6
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

—
7
Disability Rights Idaho Inc

The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.

—
8
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
9
Idaho Health Care Association Inc

The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.

—
10
Family Health Services Corporation

Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.

Health
11
The Housing Company

To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…

Unclassified
12
Idaho Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Idaho Humane Society (IHS) is to advocate for the welfare and responsible care of animals, protect them from neglect and cruelty, and promote humane education, awareness and compassion for all living creatures.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Treasure Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Women's and Children's Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC: $307,860 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INCUnited Way of South Central Idaho Inc: $57,875 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of South Central Idaho In…Women's and Children's Alliance: $132,015 · Human ServicesWomen's and Children's All…THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $52,565 · Human ServicesTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO IN…IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $30,650 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INCSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT: $26,959 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT D…CATCH INC: $24,604 · Human ServicesCATCH INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $107,906 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBOISE RESCUE MISSION: $106,391 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $158,294 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK …Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $56,458 · HealthRonald McDo…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $29,222 · HealthAMERICAN CA…COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC: $27,838 · HealthCOMMUNITY H…INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $5,384 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$365,735Human Services$266,793Other$214,297Food & Nutrition$158,294Health$113,518Housing & Shelter$5,500Recreation & Sports$5,384

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC: $307,860 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $158,294 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance: $132,015 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Way of South Central Idaho Inc: $57,875 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $56,458 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC: $52,565 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $30,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $29,222 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC: $27,838 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT: $26,959 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCATCH INC: $24,604 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $5,384 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds United Way of South Central Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds CATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Angels Among US Inc · Idaho Housing Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idacorp Employee Community Services Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idacorp Employee Community Services Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Idacorp Employee Community Services Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Idacorp Employee Community Services Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Idacorp Employee Community Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph