Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Icap Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Public Safety & Disaster$60kHuman Services$27kHousing & Shelter$16kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$10kInternational$8kAnimals$5kHealth$4k
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NYC FUND INC$15,000
CITY YEAR INC$10,000
US-KOSOVO FOUNDATION$6,000
GOVERNORS ISLAND CORPORATION$5,000
HOPE AUTISM FOUNDATION$4,000
REACH THE WORLD COMPANY$1,000
EXHALE TO INHALE INC$1,000
THE CARTER BURDEN NETWORK$500
COMMUNITIES OF FAITH FOR HOUSING IN$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $4k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS NEW JERSEY REGIO: $50k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS NEW JERSEY REGIO: $10k → 11%EXHALE TO INHALE INC: $1k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE INC: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Columbia Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Redlich Horwitz Foundation
3
Hurwitz Family Foundation
4
New York Foundation
5
Rusi (Us) Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
7
Rzh Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Thomas and Caroline Kurtz Foundation
9
The Mayer - Rothschild Foundation
Health
10
The Janus Henderson Foundation
11
Harvard Club of Ny Historical Foundation
Environment
12
Berggruen Institute
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc and the most unlike its peers is Us-Kosovo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $60,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and BranchesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INCHOPE AUTISM FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NYC FUND INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR …CITY YEAR INC — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES OF FAITH FOR HOUSING INC — $500 · OtherCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC — $500 · OtherKALUZ FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUS-KOSOVO FOUNDATION — $6,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,920 · InternationalGOVERNORS ISLAND CORPORATION — $5,000 · AnimalsREACH THE WORLD COMPANY — $1,000 · Education
Human Services$90,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Other$11,000Philanthropy$10,000International$7,920Animals$5,000Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NYC FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALUZ FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,920 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH THE WORLD COMPANY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEXHALE TO INHALE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Icap Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • City Year Inc21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph