Skip to content
Iac Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Iac Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
71
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$2.2MArts & Culture$473kHuman Services$462kPhilanthropy$435kRecreation & Sports$336kPublic Safety & Disaster$253kYouth Development$221kFood & Nutrition$206kOther$0
02FY2025 · 71 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k49 grants · $746k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDSON GUILD$300,000
AMERICA ON TECH$50,000
MOUSE INC$30,000
FRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC$30,000
FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC$30,000
GOTHAM GIVES INC$25,000
NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT$25,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA$25,000
THE JUILLIARD SCHOOL$25,000
LITERACY PARTNERS INC$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE HIGHLINE$25,000
CHURCH OF THE HOLY APOSTLES SOUP KITCHEN$21,375
THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC$20,000
JONES VALLEY URBAN FARM$20,000
C DEOPERSAUD$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $577k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Concrete Rose Community Foundation: $5k → 7%ELIZABETH COALITION TO HOUSE THE HOMELESS: $15k → 10%BLOOMAGAINBKLYN: $4k → 20%HUDSON GUILD: $300k → 17%Hudson Guild: $30k → 17%Hudson Guild: $15k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $15k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $8k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $30k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $15k → 17%Harlem Children's Zone Inc: $25k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $12k → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $8k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $25k → 17%The Teak Fellowship: $25k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $15k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP: $15k → 17%THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 57 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
135

Total granted

$3.2M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+9%

Still filing today

72%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $446k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HUDSON GUILDINC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $368k · revenue +25%
  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue +74%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • MR
    MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • TJ
    THE JUILLIARD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CF
    CLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Sacred Ways Foundation Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 238 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
119/120
Grantees still filing
73/120
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $105,000 · OtherALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $85,500 · Other+132 more: $2,120,275 · Other+132 moreJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $150,000 · EducationJUILLIARD SCHOOLIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY …SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $60,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUCATION…PROJECT ROUSSEAU INC: $50,000 · EducationAMERICA ON TECH INC: $50,000 · EducationAMERICA NEEDS YOU: $45,000 · EducationPREP FOR PREP: $40,000 · EducationCornell University: $37,700 · EducationNew York University: $37,500 · EducationTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA: $35,000 · Education+28 more: $399,500 · Education+28 moreHUDSON GUILDINC: $368,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON GUILD…THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEAK FEL…HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILD…FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $30,000 · Human Services+2 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesGOTHAM GIVES INC: $275,000 · PhilanthropyNew York City Partnership Foundation Inc: $55,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $115,000 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureDOWNTOWN EVENTS GROUP INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $38,000 · Arts & CultureE4E RELIEF LLC: $190,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFDNY FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 · Public Safety & DisasterFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsHUDSON RIVER COMMUNITY SAILING INC: $38,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $30,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,410,775Education$1,039,700Human Services$568,000Philanthropy$405,000Arts & Culture$388,000Public Safety & Disaster$252,500Recreation & Sports$218,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUDSON GUILDINC: $368,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetGOTHAM GIVES INC: $275,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetE4E RELIEF LLC: $190,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC: $150,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $150,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $105,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $85,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFDNY FOUNDATION INC: $62,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York City Partnership Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT ROUSSEAU INC: $50,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetPROSECUTOR IMPACT: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA NEEDS YOU: $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $42,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUDSON RIVER COMMUNITY SAILING INC: $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCornell University: $37,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA: $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL IOWA INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN EVENTS GROUP INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER DES MOINES BOTANICAL GARDEN: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMOUSE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Partners Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…Pinkerton FoundationThe New York Communit…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Sidley Austin Fou…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…May and Samuel Rudin …Altman FoundationBrooklyn Community Fo…Jewish Communal FundCharities Aid Foundat…Pwc Foundation Inc
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · Altman Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Pwc Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iac Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iac Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Thread Inc: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • Wheaton College: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Iac Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Iac Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 238 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Iac’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home