Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hyman N Dubowy Char Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$134kEducation$25kHealth$21kScience & Tech$20kYouth Development$20kPhilanthropy$10kCommunity Improvement$10kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$895k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE$10,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND INC$10,000
LA-ARETZ FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF ATID$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF ATID: $10k → 7%The Koby Mandell Foundation Inc: $10k → 6%Emunah of America Inc: $11k → 17%LA-ARETZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM: $15k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN: $16k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TECHNODA: $10k → 5%Good People Fund Inc: $13k → 16%FRIENDS OF ATID: $10k → 7%FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLO: $10k → 6%IGY CO A WIDER BRIDGE: $10k → 17%Paamonim: $10k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE: $10k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TECHNODA: $10k → 5%ORT America Inc: $15k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN: $10k → 9%FRIENDS OF AKIM USA: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE: $10k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITAL INC: $11k → 17%P E F ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $10k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $10k → 17%P E F ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $10k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 4 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$86k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-5%

Still filing today

50%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN
    2× · 2020–2023 · $26k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ATID
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +43%
  • OA
    ORT AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -24%
  • THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
2
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Panim El Panim Inc

To promote jewish unity and jewish identity, and to deepen the connection between the people of israel and the land of israel.

Religion
5
American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc

To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.

Education
6
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
7
American Friends of Yeshivath Meor Hatalmud

Educational assistance and talmud research

Education
8
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
10
American Friends of Bimad Alon Moreh Inc

The funds raised go to support a school for students and their families in the state of israel.

—
11
Tel Aviv Museum's American Friends Inc

To provide support for the tel aviv museum located in israel

Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Atid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN: $25,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDANFRIENDS OF ATID: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ATIDORT AMERICA INC: $15,000 · OtherORT AMERICA INCFRIENDS OF AKIM USA INC: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF AKIM USA INCLA-ARETZ FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherLA-ARETZ FOUNDATIONIGY CO A WIDER BRIDGE: $10,000 · OtherIGY CO A WIDER BRIDGEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM …THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $13,000 · InternationalTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $11,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPIT…EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $10,500 · InternationalEMUNAH OF AMERICA INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS …Paamonim: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPaamonimTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TECHNODA INC: $20,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIE…FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY LTD: $10,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF JE…
Other$90,500International$69,500Philanthropy$60,000Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TECHNODA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPaamonim: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF AKIM USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY LTD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyman N Dubowy Char Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyman N Dubowy Char Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hyman N Dubowy Char Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph