Skip to content
Hyde Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hyde Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$190kHealth$170kEnvironment$134kAnimals$131kInternational$110kArts & Culture$89kHuman Services$58kRecreation & Sports$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $142k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MULTICARE FOUNDATION C HYDE$10,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$6,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF AMERICA$6,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIERCE COUNTY$6,000
ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION$6,000
DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER (DESC)$6,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
YMCA PIERCE KITSAP COUNTY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RARE PLANT CARE AND CONSERVATION$5,000
ARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING$5,000
EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ROTARY FOUNDATION$5,000
GRAND CINEMA CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND BASKETBALL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $500 → 12%WITH LOVE OREGON: $3k → 8%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $2k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $500 → 12%WITH LOVE OREGON: $2k → 8%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $1k → 9%WITH LOVE OREGON: $1k → 8%RAPHAEL HOSE OF PORTLAND: $7k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $5k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $4k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $3k → 12%CHILD FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$877k · 58 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

58 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
44

Total granted

$877k
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+18%

Still filing today

59%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalAnimalsEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +123%
  • PC
    PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $44k · revenue +70%
  • RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $32k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • EF
    EMERGENCY FOOD NETWOOK PIERCE CO
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • MC
    MULTICARE C H HDYE MEMORIAL ENDOWME
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
4
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
7
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
8
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
9
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
12
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
36/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $43,500 · OtherPIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND PILOT CLUB: $42,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND PILOT CLUBROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 · OtherYMCA OF PIERCE KITSAP COUNTY: $29,000 · OtherORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $28,000 · OtherMULTICARE FOUNDATION C HYDE: $27,500 · OtherEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $26,000 · Other+82 more: $531,750 · Other+82 moreCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $48,500 · EnvironmentFriends of Lakewood: $14,000 · EnvironmentFORTERRA NW: $11,000 · Environment+2 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $32,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUST: $12,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $9,000 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $3,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 · InternationalTacoma Art Museum: $30,500 · Arts & CultureArtist Trust: $20,000 · Arts & CultureGREENTRIKE: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · AnimalsPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $5,500 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $3,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,500 · AnimalsRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $32,000 · Human ServicesWITH LOVE OREGON INC: $6,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesChild Foundation: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING: $14,000 · EducationAVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC: $13,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $6,500 · EducationHILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE: $2,500 · Education
Other$757,750Environment$75,500International$59,000Arts & Culture$59,000Animals$45,500Human Services$45,000Education$44,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $48,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $43,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $32,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTacoma Art Museum: $30,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $28,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES WRIGHT ACADEMY: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetArtist Trust: $20,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetVERA HOUSE INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING: $14,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of Lakewood: $14,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC: $13,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORTERRA NW: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENTRIKE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown Emergency Service Center: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWITH LOVE OREGON INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT WASHINGTON VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPTA OREGON CONGRESS Buckman PTA: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUKANDU: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINK BOOTS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRAILKEEPERS OF OREGON: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Tacoma Art Museum ↗
  • Who funds ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES WRIGHT ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Artist Trust ↗
  • Who funds VERA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Lakewood ↗
  • Who funds AVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds POINT DEFIANCE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitabl…Fuchsg & M Fdn TaiThe Bamford FoundationGreater Tacoma Commun…The Norcliffe Foundat…Kilworth Florence Cha…Seattle FoundationThe Dimmer Family Fou…Woodworth Family Foun…Ben B Cheney Foundati…The Russell Family Fo…Medina Foundation
M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Bamford Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Seattle Foundation · The Dimmer Family Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Ben B Cheney Foundation Inc · The Russell Family Foundation · Medina Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyde Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyde Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Trailkeepers of Oregon: 19% of income from government
  • With Love Oregon Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Oregon Museum of Science and Industry: 4% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hyde Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home